A review of layer of protection analysis techniques for oil and gas industry

被引:4
作者
Markowski, Adam S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Lodz, Safety Engn Dept, Fac Proc & Environm Engn, PL-90133 Lodz, Poland
关键词
process safety; risk assessment; safety assurance; RISK-ASSESSMENT; LOPA; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1504/IJOGCT.2012.044178
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The paper indicates advantages (and disadvantages) of layer of protection analysis (LOPA) over other methods to support its paramount position among different process safety analysis (PSA) methods in use today. Its simplicity (using order-of-magnitude estimates for all elements that constitute an accident scenario), universality (easy adaptation to particular needs), directness to indicate the effect of risk reduction measures as well as to assess the total level of risk to be compared with the company risk tolerance criteria are strong arguments for wider application of LOPA. However, the method may have some limitations (disadvantages) in comparison to other methods and therefore different extended approaches of LOPA have been developed to overcome the problem. Those approaches include an inclusion of an expert system into accident scenario identification (ExSysLOPA), new approach to deal with uncertainty connected with input data (fuzzy LOPA) as well as for explosion at workplace risk assessment (ExLOPA). Some of these combined techniques will be presented here and they support and extend the applications of layer of protection analysis, especially for safety assurance assessment of risk-based determination that is used in oil and gas process industries. [Received: March 25, 2011; Accepted: June 16, 2011]
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 79
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fired equipment safety in the oil & gas industry A review of changes in practices over the last 50 years
    Dugue, Jacques
    INFUB - 11TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL FURNACES AND BOILERS (INFUB-11), 2017, 120 : 2 - 19
  • [32] Risk Assessment and Prevention in Oil-gas Exploration Industry: the Tarim Basin as the Case
    Zhan Li
    Yang Changming
    Hu Shan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK AND RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 257 - 262
  • [33] CO2 storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs: A review
    Wei, Bo
    Wang, Bowen
    Li, Xin
    Aishan, Mayila
    Ju, Yiwen
    ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 9 (02): : 76 - 93
  • [34] The Application of Bow-Tie Method in Hydrogen Sulfide Risk Management Using Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA)
    Yazdi M.
    Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2017, 17 (2) : 291 - 303
  • [35] Simplified Uncertainty Analysis of Layer of Protection Analysis Results
    Freeman, Raymond
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2013, 32 (04) : 351 - 360
  • [36] Radiological impact on man and the environment from the oil and gas industry:: Risk assessment for the critical group
    Steinhäusler, F
    RADIATION SAFETY PROBLEMS IN THE CASPIAN REGION, 2004, 41 : 129 - 134
  • [37] Economic Impact and Risk Assessment of Sand and Dust Storms (SDS) on the Oil and Gas Industry in Kuwait
    Al-Hemoud, Ali
    Al-Dousari, Ali
    Misak, Raafat
    Al-Sudairawi, Mane
    Naseeb, Adil
    Al-Dashti, Hassan
    Al-Dousari, Noor
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [38] Scenario-based risk assessment of TENORM waste disposal options in oil and gas industry
    ALNabhani, Khalid
    Khan, Faisal
    Yang, Ming
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 40 : 55 - 66
  • [39] A new cybersecurity risk assessment framework for the hospitality industry: techniques and methods for enhanced data protection and threat mitigation
    Pipyros, Kosmas
    Liasidou, Sotiroula
    WORLDWIDE HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM THEMES, 2025, 17 (01) : 48 - 61
  • [40] Implementing layer of protection analysis in a global organization
    Fargie, Dave
    Pearson, Kathy
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2022, 41 (01) : 66 - 72