Research on the impact mechanism of heterogeneous environmental regulation on enterprise green technology innovation

被引:194
作者
Wang, Liping [1 ]
Long, Ying [1 ]
Li, Chuang [2 ]
机构
[1] Jimei Univ, Finance & Econ Coll, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
[2] Jimei Univ, Sch Business Adm, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental regulation; Green technological innovation; Moderating effect; Transformation rate of innovation; achievements; Heterogeneity; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; ECO-INNOVATION; CHINA; PROTECTION; VOLUNTARY; COMPETITIVENESS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116127
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green technology innovation (GTI) is an effective way to promote the green development of economy, and government environmental regulations are an important means to encourage enterprises to carry out GTI. Taking Chinese A-share listed enterprises from 2010 to 2019 as samples, this paper divides environmental regulations into three categories: command-based environmental regulation (ER1), market-based environmental regulation (ER2) and voluntary environmental regulation (ER3), studies their impact on enterprise GTI, and discusses the joint effect of enterprise research and development (R&D) investment and government support from the perspective of internal and external linkage of enterprises. In addition, this paper also analyzes the compound effect and time effect of environmental regulation. The research conclusions are as follows: (1) From the perspective of policy types, both ER1 and ER 2 could stimulate enterprises to carry out GTI, and the promotion effect of green utility model patents is slightly higher than that of green invention patents. ER3 inhibits enterprise GTI. In addition, this paper finds that the effect of three environmental regulations acting at the same time is greater than that of one of them. (2) The mechanism analysis shows that the R&D investment of enterprise positively could moderate the relationship between ER2 and green invention at the significance level of 5%, positively moderate the relationship between ER2 and green utility model patent at the significance level of 1%, and negatively moderate the relationship between ER3 and green utility model patent at the significance level of 5%. The government support could moderate the relationship between environmental regulation and green utility model patents at the significance level of 5% and 10%. (3) The effect analysis shows that the transformation rate of GTI in China needs to be improved. The three environmental regulations could have an effect on enterprise GTI in a short period, and ER1 has the fastest effect. (4) Considering the differences in the level of economic development and resource endowments in various regions of China, this paper classifies the sample enterprises and finds that the impact of environmental regulation on enterprise GTI is heterogeneous in terms of location, ownership nature, factor density and industry type. The research results provide the important reference for the formulation and implementation of environmental regulation policies according to local conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[11]  
[高翠云 Gao Cuiyun], 2020, [资源科学, Resources Science], V42, P776
[12]   Environmental Regulation, Government R&D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data [J].
Guo, Yingyuan ;
Xia, Xingneng ;
Zhang, Sheng ;
Zhang, Danping .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
[13]   Do the Green Credit Guidelines Affect Corporate Green Technology Innovation? Empirical Research from China [J].
Hong, Min ;
Li, Zhenghui ;
Drakeford, Benjamin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (04) :1-21
[14]  
Huang H.P., 2022, STAT RES, V39, P23, DOI [10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2022.05.002, DOI 10.19343/J.CNKI.11-1302/C.2022.05.002]
[15]   Environmental Taxation, Inequality and Engel's Law: The Double Dividend of Redistribution [J].
Klenert, David ;
Schwerhoff, Gregor ;
Edenhofer, Ottmar ;
Mattauch, Linus .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2018, 71 (03) :605-624
[16]   The role of environmental regulation in the future competitiveness of the pulp and paper industry: the case of the sulfur emissions directive in Northern Europe [J].
Korhonen, J. ;
Patari, S. ;
Toppinen, A. ;
Tuppura, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 108 :864-872
[17]   The environmental Porter hypothesis: theory, evidence, and a model of timing of adoption [J].
Kriechel, Ben ;
Ziesemer, Thomas .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 18 (03) :267-294
[18]  
Kuang C.E., 2019, Econ. Surv, V36, P126, DOI DOI 10.15931/J.CNKI.1006-1096.20190116.003
[19]  
Kuang Y.F., 2012, Econ. Res., V47, P62
[20]   Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance [J].
Lee, Ki-Hoon ;
Min, Byung .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 108 :534-542