Development and Validation of the Primary Care Team Dynamics Survey

被引:48
作者
Song, Hummy [3 ]
Chien, Alyna T. [4 ,5 ]
Fisher, Josephine [1 ]
Martin, Julia [4 ]
Peters, Antoinette S. [5 ,6 ]
Hacker, Karen [7 ]
Rosenthal, Meredith B. [1 ]
Singer, Sara J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, PhD Program Hlth Policy Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Gen Pediat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Allegheny Cty Hlth Dept, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Survey; primary care; team dynamics; team effectiveness; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; PATIENT ACTIVATION; MANAGEMENT TEAMS; HEALTH OUTCOMES; RELIABILITY; WORK; COMMUNICATION; EXPERIENCES; ATTITUDES; HANDS;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6773.12257
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo develop and validate a survey instrument designed to measure team dynamics in primary care. Data Sources/Study SettingWe studied 1,080 physician and nonphysician health care professionals working at 18 primary care practices participating in a learning collaborative aimed at improving team-based care. Study DesignWe developed a conceptual model and administered a cross-sectional survey addressing team dynamics, and we assessed reliability and discriminant validity of survey factors and the overall survey's goodness-of-fit using structural equation modeling. Data CollectionWe administered the survey between September 2012 and March 2013. Principal FindingsOverall response rate was 68 percent (732 respondents). Results support a seven-factor model of team dynamics, suggesting that conditions for team effectiveness, shared understanding, and three supportive processes are associated with acting and feeling like a team and, in turn, perceived team effectiveness. This model demonstrated adequate fit (goodness-of-fit index: 0.91), scale reliability (Cronbach's alphas: 0.71-0.91), and discriminant validity (average factor correlations: 0.49). ConclusionsIt is possible to measure primary care team dynamics reliably using a 29-item survey. This survey may be used in ambulatory settings to study teamwork and explore the effect of efforts to improve team-based care. Future studies should demonstrate the importance of team dynamics for markers of team effectiveness (e.g., work satisfaction, care quality, clinical outcomes).
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 921
页数:25
相关论文
共 72 条
[41]   Does Team Building Work? [J].
Klein, Cameron ;
DiazGranados, Deborah ;
Salas, Eduardo ;
Le, Huy ;
Burke, C. Shawn ;
Lyons, Rebecca ;
Goodwin, Gerald F. .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2009, 40 (02) :181-222
[42]  
Klein KJ., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE
[43]   Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams [J].
Kozlowski, Steve W. J. ;
Ilgen, Daniel R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, :77-124
[44]   MANY HANDS MAKE LIGHT THE WORK - CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF SOCIAL LOAFING [J].
LATANE, B ;
WILLIAMS, K ;
HARKINS, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (06) :822-832
[45]   Attitudes toward working on interdisciplinary healthcare teams: A comparison by discipline [J].
Leipzig, RM ;
Hyer, K ;
Ek, K ;
Wallenstein, S ;
Vezina, ML ;
Fairchild, S ;
Cassel, CK ;
Howe, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2002, 50 (06) :1141-1148
[46]   What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature [J].
Lemieux-Charles, Louise ;
McGuire, Wendy L. .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2006, 63 (03) :263-300
[47]  
Leonard-Barton D. A., 1999, SPARKS FLY IGNITION
[48]  
Mahoney B., 2010, TEAM DEV MEASURE
[49]   Less Tinkering, More Transforming How to Build Successful Patient-Centered Medical Homes [J].
Margolius, David .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (18) :1702-1703
[50]   The team survey: a tool for health care team development [J].
Millward, LJ ;
Jeffries, N .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 35 (02) :276-287