Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand

被引:17
作者
Neubauer, J. [1 ]
Neubauer, C. [1 ]
Gerstmair, A. [1 ]
Krauss, T. [1 ]
Reising, K. [2 ]
Zajonc, H. [3 ]
Kotter, E. [1 ]
Langer, M. [1 ]
Fiebich, M. [4 ]
Voigt, J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Radiol, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Plast & Hand Surg, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Inst Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Freiburg, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2016年 / 188卷 / 05期
关键词
hand; CT; radiation safety; cone beam computed tomography; CBCT; low dose; DIGITAL VOLUME TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; CT; WRIST; CBCT; VISUALIZATION; RESOLUTION; MSCT;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-101251
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Comparison of radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in examinations of the hand. Materials and Methods: Dose calculations were carried out by means of Monte Carlo simulations in MDCT and CBCT. A corpse hand was examined in a 320-row MDCT scanner and a dedicated extremities CBCT scanner with standard protocols and multiple low-dose protocols. The image quality of the examinations was evaluated by 5 investigators using a Likert scale from 1 (very good) to 5 (very poor) regarding depiction of cortical bone, cancellous bone, joint surfaces, soft tissues and artifacts. For a sum of ratings of all structures <50 a good overall image quality was expected. The studies with at least good overall image quality were compared with respect to the dose. Results: The dose of the standard examination was 13.21 (12.96 to 13.46 CI) mGy in MDCT and 7.15 (6.99 to 7.30 CI) mGy in CBCT. The lowest dose in a study with good overall image quality was 4.54 (4.43 to 4.64 CI) mGy in MDCT and 5.72 (5.59 to 5.85 CI) mGy in CBCT. Conclusion: Although the dose of the standard protocols in the CBCT is lower than in the MDCT, the MDCT can realize a good overall image quality at a lower dose than the CBCT. Dose optimization of CT examination protocols for the hand is useful in both modalities, the MDCT has an even greater potential for optimization. Key points:. Low dose examinations of the hand are feasible in CBCT and MDCT. In default settings CBCT has a lower dose than MDCT.. MDCT enables a good image quality at a lower dose than CBCT. Citation Format:. Neubauer J, Neubauer C, Gerstmair A et al. Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand. Fortschr Rontgenstr 2016; 188: 488-493
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 493
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1948, RANK CORRELATION MET
[2]   MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANCE TESTS - THE BONFERRONI METHOD .10. [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6973) :170-170
[3]   Dedicated Cone-Beam CT System for Extremity Imaging [J].
Carrino, John A. ;
Al Muhit, Abdullah ;
Zbijewski, Wojciech ;
Thawait, Gaurav K. ;
Stayman, J. Webster ;
Packard, Nathan ;
Senn, Robert ;
Yang, Dong ;
Foos, David H. ;
Yorkston, John ;
Siewerdsen, Jeffrey H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (03) :816-824
[4]   Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Chau, Anson C. M. ;
Fung, Karl .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 107 (04) :559-565
[5]   Comparison of organ doses and image quality between CT and flat panel XperCT scans in wrist and inner ear examinations [J].
Damet, J. ;
Sans-Merce, M. ;
Mieville, F. ;
Becker, M. ;
Poletti, P. A. ;
Verdun, F. R. ;
Baechler, S. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 139 (1-3) :164-168
[6]   Cone-beam computed tomography: a new low dose, high resolution imaging technique of the wrist, presentation of three cases with technique [J].
De Cock, Jens ;
Mermuys, Koen ;
Goubau, Jean ;
Van Petegem, Simon ;
Houthoofd, Brecht ;
Casselman, Jan W. .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (01) :93-96
[7]   Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature [J].
De Vos, W. ;
Casselman, J. ;
Swennen, G. R. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (06) :609-625
[8]   Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system [J].
Demehri, S. ;
Muhit, A. ;
Zbijewski, W. ;
Stayman, J. W. ;
Yorkston, J. ;
Packard, N. ;
Senn, R. ;
Yang, D. ;
Foos, D. ;
Thawait, G. K. ;
Fayad, L. M. ;
Chhabra, A. ;
Carrino, J. A. ;
Siewerdsen, J. H. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (06) :1742-1751
[9]   Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: A radiation dose evaluation [J].
Garcia Silva, Maria Alves ;
Wolf, Ulrich ;
Heinicke, Frank ;
Bumann, Axel ;
Visser, Heiko ;
Hirsch, Edgar .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 133 (05) :640.e1-640.e5
[10]   Application Possibilities and Initial Experience with Digital Volume Tomography in Hand and Wrist Imaging [J].
Goerke, S. M. ;
Neubauer, J. ;
Zajonc, H. ;
Thiele, J. R. ;
Kotter, E. ;
Langer, M. ;
Stark, G. B. ;
Lampert, F. M. .
HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2015, 47 (01) :24-31