Survival after biventricular mechanical circulatory support: Does the type of device matter?

被引:45
|
作者
Kirsch, Matthias [1 ]
Mazzucotelli, Jean-Philippe [3 ]
Roussel, Jean-Christian [2 ]
Bouchot, Olivier [4 ]
N'Loga, Joseph [5 ]
Leprince, Pascal [1 ]
Litzler, Pierre-Yves [6 ]
Vincentelli, Andre [7 ]
机构
[1] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Inst Cardiol, Dept Heart Surg, Paris, France
[2] Hop Laennec, Inst Thorax, Dept Heart Surg, Nantes, France
[3] Nouvel Hop Civil, Dept Heart Surg, Strasbourg, France
[4] Hop Bocage, Dept Heart Surg, Dijon, France
[5] Hop Cardiovasc & Pneumol Louis Pradel, Dept Heart Surg, Bron, France
[6] Hop Charles Nicolle, Dept Heart Surg, Rouen, France
[7] Hop Cardiol, Dept Heart Surg, F-59037 Lille, France
来源
关键词
mechanical circulatory support; ventricular assist device; total artificial heart; survival; TOTAL ARTIFICIAL-HEART; ASSIST DEVICES; EXPERIENCE; TRANSPLANT; THORATEC; BRIDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2011.11.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Biventricular support can be achieved using paracorporeal biventricular assist devices (BiVADs), the total artificial heart (TAH), and implantable VADs. This study evaluated the influence of the device on patient survival. METHODS: Data from 383 patients (321 men [84%]) undergoing primary, planned biventricular support using durable devices between 2000 and 2010 were extracted from the French multicentric Groupe de Reflexion sur l'Assistance Mecanique (GRAM) registry. Mean age was 41.6 +/- 14.0 years. Patients were classified as group 1, 255 (67%) with paracorporeal BiVADs; group 2, 90 (24%) with TAH; and group 3, 38 (10%) with implantable BiVADs. RESULTS: Mean patient support duration was 82.8 +/- 107.4 days and similar among groups (p = 0.53). Bridging to transplantation was successful in 211 patients (55%) and to recovery in 23 (6%). Mortality on device was similar among groups (p = 0.16). TAH patients had a significantly lower stroke rate (p < 0.0001). Actuarial estimates for survival while on support were 75.2% +/- 2.3%, 64.4% +/- 2.7%, 61.1% +/- 2.8%, and 56.8% +/- 3.1% at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days, respectively, and were similar among groups. However, TAH patients undergoing prolonged support (90 clays) showed a trend toward improved survival (p = 0.08). Actuarial post-transplant survival estimates were, respectively, 81.7 +/- 2.7, 75.3 +/- 3.0, 73.0 +/- 3.0, and 64.7 +/- 3.7 at 1 month and 1, 3, and 5 years and were similar among groups (p = 0.84). CONCLUSION: Survival while on support and after heart transplantation did not differ significantly in patients supported with paracorporeal BiVADs, implantable BiVADs, or the TAH. Patients undergoing prolonged support (>90 days) tended to have improved survival when supported with TAM compared with BiVADs, which may be related to a lower incidence of neurologic events. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012;31:501-8 (C) 2012 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 508
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Survival After Heart Transplant Listing for Infants on Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Conway, Jennifer
    Cantor, Ryan
    Koehl, Devin
    Spicer, Robert
    Gupta, Dipankar
    McCulloch, Michael
    Asante-Korang, Alfred
    Eulrich, Dean T.
    Kirklin, James K.
    Pahl, Elfriede
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (21):
  • [22] Mechanical Circulatory Support Before and After Heart Transplantation: Impact on Survival
    Raffa, Giuseppe M.
    Di Gesaro, Gabriele
    Sciacca, Sergio
    Turrisi, Marco
    Morsolini, Marco
    Panarello, Giovanna
    Falletta, Calogero
    Armaro, Alessandro
    Romano, Giuseppe
    Giunta, Andrea
    Longo, Rosalia
    Arcadipane, Antonio
    Clemenza, Francesco
    Pilato, Michele
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 : 16 - 16
  • [23] Biventricular Impella Support: A Contemporary Approach to Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Biventricular Failure
    Aghili, N.
    Bader, Y.
    Kimmelstiel, C.
    Weintraub, A.
    Kiernan, M.
    Vest, A.
    DeNofrio, D.
    Pham, D.
    Kapur, N.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04): : S278 - S278
  • [24] Psychiatric psychosomatic disorders and coping mechanisms during mechanical circulatory support with the biventricular Berlin Heart Assist Device
    Albert, W
    Bittner, A
    Hetzer, R
    QUALITY OF LIFE AND PSYCHOSOMATICS: IN MECHANICAL CIRCULATION, THE HEART TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, : 29 - 43
  • [25] The Optimization of Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Combination Considering Ventricular Load in Biventricular Failure Condition: A Simulation Study
    Matsushita, Hiroki
    Nishikawa, Takuya
    Yokota, Shohei
    Kakuuchi, Midori
    Yokoi, Aimi
    Nishiura, Akitsugu
    Uemura, Kazunori
    Kawada, Toru
    Li, Meihua
    Saku, Keita
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [26] Changes of biventricular function after CABG surgery: does cardioplegia type matter?
    Ordiene, Rasa
    Unikas, Ramunas
    Abramaviciute, Agne
    Lenkutis, Tadas
    Sirvinskas, Edmundas
    Jakuska, Povilas
    Benetis, Rimantas
    Ereminiene, Egle
    PERFUSION-UK, 2021, 36 (05): : 447 - 454
  • [27] Modeling of Virtual Mechanical Circulatory Hemodynamics for Biventricular Heart Failure Support
    Dennis W. Horvath
    Anthony R. Polakowski
    Christine Flick
    Kiyotaka Fukamachi
    David J. Horvath
    Jamshid H. Karimov
    Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, 2020, 11 : 699 - 707
  • [28] Mechanical circulatory support in CS: device or patient?
    Morici, Nuccia
    Tavazzi, Guido
    OPEN HEART, 2021, 8 (02):
  • [29] Designs for mechanical circulatory support device studies
    Neaton, James D.
    Normand, Sharon-Lise
    Gelijns, Annetine
    Starling, Randall C.
    Mann, Douglas L.
    Konstam, Marvin A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2007, 13 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [30] BIVENTRICULAR MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT. HISTORY AND CURRENT STATE OF THE PROBLEM
    Zhulkov, M. O.
    Sirota, D. A.
    Khvan, D. S.
    Makaev, A. G.
    Agaeva, H. A.
    Zykov, I. S.
    Fomichev, A. V.
    Poveschenko, O. V.
    Surovtseva, M. A.
    Chernyavsky, A. M.
    VESTNIK TRANSPLANTOLOGII I ISKUSSTVENNYH ORGANOV, 2023, 25 (02): : 49 - 56