Characterizing fine-scale patterns of alternative agricultural landscapes with landscape pattern indices

被引:39
作者
Corry, RC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Design & Rural Dev, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
Corn Belt; data resolution; FRAGSTATS; Iowa; landscape design; landscape metrics; planning; small mammals;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-004-5036-8
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Landscape pattern indices are common tools of landscape ecologists, affording comparisons of different study areas, or the same study area at different times. Since the advent of popular index-calculating software, more landscapes can be analyzed in short amounts of time, yet the behaviour of landscape pattern indices can vary for different contexts or data characteristics, complicating interpretation. I applied a selected set of landscape pattern indices to fine-resolution (3 m) data representing a highly fragmented landscape - Corn Belt Iowa agriculture - to investigate the performance of landscape pattern indices. Indices measured pattern attributes that affect the viability of small mammal populations, namely habitat proportion and connectivity and landscape grain size and heterogeneity. Results showed that the performance of indices for fine-resolution data can be highly variable, depending upon data and contextual issues like the presence of linear elements and the amount of habitat. For these Corn Belt landscapes good habitat proportions and patch sizes were small (commonly less than 10% and less than 1 ha, respectively), and connectivity was variable depending on the measure. Aggregation and mean nearest neighbour indices performed better than other connectivity indices. Fine-resolution data representing highly fragmented landscapes can raise difficulties for indices of landscape configuration. Landscape pattern indices require improvement to perform better for increasingly available fine-resolution data representing common landscape types.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 608
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes [J].
Burel, F ;
Baudry, J ;
Butet, A ;
Clergeau, P ;
Delettre, Y ;
Le Coeur, D ;
Dubs, F ;
Morvan, N ;
Paillat, G ;
Petit, S ;
Thenail, C ;
Brunel, E ;
Lefeuvre, JC .
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1998, 19 (01) :47-60
[2]  
CARDILLE JA, 2001, LEARNING LANDSCAPE E, P85
[3]   Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks [J].
Cook, EA .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2002, 58 (2-4) :269-280
[4]  
Corry RC, 1999, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, PTS A AND B, P547
[5]  
CORRY RC, 2004, LANDSC REV, V9, P86
[6]  
CORRY RC, IN PRESS LANDSCAPE U
[7]  
Corry Robert C., 2002, P92, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511613654.007
[8]  
Cressie N, 1993, STAT SPATIAL DATA
[9]   Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern US [J].
Fauth, PT ;
Gustafson, EJ ;
Rabenold, KN .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2000, 15 (07) :621-631
[10]  
Forman R.T. T., 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, Cambridge