Detection and Grading of Esophageal Varices on Liver CT: Comparison of Standard and Thin-Section Multiplanar Reconstructions in Diagnostic Accuracy

被引:38
作者
Yu, Nam C. [2 ]
Margolis, Daniel [1 ]
Hsu, Margaret [1 ]
Raman, Steven S. [1 ]
Lu, David S. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Methodist Hosp, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
CT; esophageal varices; liver cirrhosis; PORTAL-HYPERTENSION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES; HEMORRHAGE; PREDICTION; ENDOSCOPY; LIGATION; BAVENO; DEFINITIONS; PROPHYLAXIS;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.5458
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of liver CT in the diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis and to determine whether thin-section multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs) improve accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We identified 109 patients with cirrhosis who underwent endoscopy within 10 weeks after dual-phase liver MDCT supplemented with thin-section axial and coronal portal venous phase reconstructions. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated each CT examination for the presence and sizes of varices using standard 5-mm axial versus 1- to 3-mm multiplanar images in separate sessions. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value calculations and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed using endoscopy as the reference standard. Interobserver variability and correlation of CT size to variceal grade were assessed. RESULTS. Twenty-six cases of high-risk esophageal varices were identified; all except two were detected on CT by one of the readers on standard 5-mm images. For both readers, sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for the discrimination of high-risk varices using a criterion of 2 mm or greater were nearly the same for the standard 5-mm images versus the 1- to 3-mm multiplanar images (sensitivity and NPV: reader 1, 96% and 98% vs 96% and 99%; reader 2, and 89% and 95% vs 89% and 96%, respectively). Standard 5-mm images yielded a lower specificity for high-risk esophageal varices than the thin-section multiplanar images, and this difference was statistically significant for reader 2. Substantial interobserver agreement was noted for both esophageal varices detection and size measurements. CONCLUSION. Standard liver CT is sensitive for the detection of high-risk varices and deserves further investigation as a potential cost-effective screening tool for the evaluation of patients with cirrhosis. The addition of 1- to 3-mm MPRs may increase specificity for risk stratification based on size measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 649
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
ASPESTRAND F, 1992, ACTA RADIOL, V33, P518
[2]   CT EVALUATION OF ESOPHAGEAL-VARICES [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
NAIDICH, DP ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
LEFLEUR, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (01) :131-135
[3]   AGREEMENT AMONG MULTIPLE OBSERVERS ON ENDOSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS OF ESOPHAGEAL-VARICES BEFORE BLEEDING [J].
BENDTSEN, F ;
SKOVGAARD, LT ;
SORENSEN, TIA ;
MATZEN, P .
HEPATOLOGY, 1990, 11 (03) :341-347
[4]   PREDICTION OF VARICEAL HEMORRHAGE BY ESOPHAGEAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
BEPPU, K ;
INOKUCHI, K ;
KOYANAGI, N ;
NAKAYAMA, S ;
SAKATA, H ;
KITANO, S ;
KOBAYASHI, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1981, 27 (04) :213-218
[5]   Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update [J].
Bruix, Jordi ;
Sherman, Morris .
HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 53 (03) :1020-1022
[6]   Evaluation of Baveno recommendations for grading esophageal varices [J].
Calès, P ;
Oberti, F ;
Bernard-Chabert, B ;
Payen, JL .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 39 (04) :657-659
[7]   Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review [J].
Colli, A ;
Fraquelli, M ;
Casazza, G ;
Massironi, S ;
Colucci, A ;
Conte, D ;
Duca, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (03) :513-523
[8]   Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: An evidence-based approach [J].
D'Amico, G ;
Pagliaro, L ;
Bosch, J .
SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE, 1999, 19 (04) :475-505
[9]  
DAGRADI AE, 1972, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V57, P520
[10]  
de Franchis R, 2000, J HEPATOL, V33, P846