Dscam2 affects visual perception in Drosophila melanogaster

被引:3
作者
Bosch, Danny S. [1 ]
van Swinderen, Bruno [2 ]
Millard, S. Sean [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biomed Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Queensland Brain Inst, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE | 2015年 / 9卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Dscam; Drosophila; visual perception; behavioral assay; motion detection; FLIGHT ORIENTATION; FINE-STRUCTURE; YAW TORQUE; BEHAVIOR; VISION; SYSTEM; MUTANT; MOTION; FLY; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00149
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Dscam2, a cell surface protein that mediates cellular repulsion, plays a crucial role in the development of the Drosophila melanogaster visual system. Dscam2 generates boundaries between neighboring modules in the fly optic lobe; in Dscam2 mutants this visual system modularity is compromised. Although developmental wiring defects have been well described in the Dscam2 mutant, behavioral consequences have not been investigated. To address this, we examined the visual behavior of Dscam2 mutant flies. Using a phototaxis assay, we ascertained that these flies are not blind, but have a reduced phototaxic response. Through population-based and single fly optomotor assays, we found that Dscam2 mutant flies can track motion but that their response is opposite to control flies under defined experimental conditions. In a fixation paradigm, which allows tethered flies to control the angular position of a visual stimulus, mutant flies' responses were diametrically opposed to those seen in control flies. These data suggest that modest changes in the modularity of the fly visual system in the Dscam2 mutant can dramatically change the perception of specific visual cues and modify behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Taste and pheromone perception in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster
    Ebbs, Michelle L.
    Amrein, Hubert
    PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 454 (05): : 735 - 747
  • [22] A natural genetic polymorphism affects retroactive interference in Drosophila melanogaster
    Reaume, Christopher J.
    Sokolowski, Marla B.
    Mery, Frederic
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 278 (1702) : 91 - 98
  • [23] Dietary restriction affects lifespan but not cognitive aging in Drosophila melanogaster
    Burger, Joep M. S.
    Buechel, Severine D.
    Kawecki, Tadeusz J.
    AGING CELL, 2010, 9 (03) : 327 - 335
  • [24] Gut microbiota affects development and olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
    Qiao, Huili
    Keesey, Ian W.
    Hansson, Bill S.
    Knaden, Markus
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 222 (05)
  • [25] Acute Exposure to Arsenic Affects Cognition in Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
    Anushree
    Ali, Md Zeeshan
    Ahsan, Jawaid
    ENTOMOLOGY AND APPLIED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2022, 9 (04): : 70 - 78
  • [26] Nutritional effects on operant visual learning in Drosophila melanogaster
    Xia, SZ
    Liu, L
    Feng, CH
    Guo, AK
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1997, 62 (02) : 263 - 271
  • [27] The foraging gene affects adult but not larval olfactory-related behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
    Shaver, SA
    Varnam, CJ
    Hilliker, AJ
    Sokolowski, MB
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 95 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [28] Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of visual long-term memory in Drosophila melanogaster
    Jiang, Huoqing
    Hou, Qinlong
    Gong, Zhefeng
    Liu, Li
    PROTEIN & CELL, 2011, 2 (03) : 215 - 222
  • [29] Odor localization requires visual feedback during free flight in Drosophila melanogaster
    Frye, MA
    Tarsitano, M
    Dickinson, MH
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 206 (05) : 843 - 855
  • [30] Downregulation of the dopamine D2-like receptor in corpus allatum affects juvenile hormone synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster females
    Gruntenko, N. E.
    Laukhina, O. V.
    Bogomolova, E. V.
    Karpova, E. K.
    Menshanov, P. N.
    Romanova, I. V.
    Rauschenbach, I. Yu.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 58 (03) : 348 - 355