How does trust affect performance in the supply chain? The moderating role of interdependence

被引:83
作者
Capaldo, Antonio [2 ]
Giannoccaro, Ilaria [1 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Bari, Dept Mech Math & Management, I-70126 Bari, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, SEGESTA Dept Management, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
Benefits of trust; Interorganizational relationships; Complex adaptive systems; NK fitness landscape model; Agent-based simulation; COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; RELATIONAL GOVERNANCE; TRANSACTION COSTS; UNITED-STATES; NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE; STRATEGY; TRUSTWORTHINESS; DETERMINANTS; OPPORTUNISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.04.008
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the positive relationship between trust and performance in the supply chain and investigates whether and how the interdependence structure of the supply chain moderates this relationship. Interdependence occurs in supply chains because supply chain partners depend upon one another for product and process accomplishments and for the tangible and intangible resources owned by their partners. Framing the supply chain as a complex adaptive system, we argue that, in supply chain contexts, both the degree of interdependence (i.e., the average number of interactions among the supply chain firms) and the overall interdependence pattern (which maps with who each supply chain firm interacts) moderate the relationship between trust and supply chain performance. The proposed conceptual framework is operationalized through the NK fitness landscape model and tested using simulation and Tobit regression analyses. Results confirm that the specific interdependence pattern that characterizes the supply chain has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between trust and supply chain performance, while the moderating effect exerted by the degree of interdependence is not statistically significant. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 49
页数:14
相关论文
共 86 条
[41]  
Kaminsky P., 2008, Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies, and case studies
[42]   Developing successful trust-based international exchange relationships [J].
Katsikeas, Constantine S. ;
Skarmeas, Dionysis ;
Bello, Daniel C. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2009, 40 (01) :132-155
[43]  
Kauffman Stuart A., 1993
[44]   On interfirm power, channel climate, and solidarity in industrial distributor-supplier dyads [J].
Kim, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2000, 28 (03) :388-405
[45]   Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach [J].
Kim, Yusoon ;
Choi, Thomas Y. ;
Yan, Tingting ;
Dooley, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (03) :194-211
[46]  
Krishnan R, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P894, DOI [10.2307/20159808, 10.5465/20159808]
[47]   Cooperative strategies in customer-supplier relationships: The role of interfirm trust [J].
Laaksonen, Toni ;
Jarimo, Toni ;
Kulmala, Harri I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 120 (01) :79-87
[48]   Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: Evidence from the retail industry [J].
Lado, Augustine A. ;
Dant, Rajiv R. ;
Tekleab, Amanuel G. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (04) :401-423
[49]   Relational governance and opportunism in logistics outsourcing relationships: empirical evidence from China [J].
Lai, Fujun ;
Tian, Yu ;
Huo, Baofeng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (09) :2501-2514
[50]  
Lazeron M., 1999, IND CORP CHANGE, V8, P235, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/8.2.235