Long-term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy

被引:33
作者
Ben-Menachem, Elinor [1 ]
Grebe, Hans Peter [2 ]
Terada, Kiyohito [3 ]
Jensen, Lori [4 ]
Li, Ting [4 ]
De Backer, Marc [5 ]
Steiniger-Brach, Bjorn [5 ]
Gasalla, Teresa [4 ]
Brock, Melissa [4 ]
Biton, Victor [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Neurosci & Physiol, Bla Straket 7,Plan 3, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Ctr Hosp Entre Douro & Vouga, Hosp Sao Sebastifio, Dept Neurol, Santa Maria Feira, Portugal
[3] NHO Shizuoka Inst Epilepsy & Neurol Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC USA
[5] UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Clin Trials Inc, Arkansas Epilepsy Program, Little Rock, AR USA
关键词
antiepileptic drug; comorbidity; lacosamide monotherapy; tolerability; PARTIAL-ONSET SEIZURES; DOUBLE-BLIND; ADJUNCTIVE LACOSAMIDE; PHASE-III; TOLERABILITY; THERAPY; ADULTS; MULTICENTER; ZONISAMIDE;
D O I
10.1111/epi.16381
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: A large-scale, double-blind trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) demonstrated that lacosamide was noninferior to controlled-release carbamazepine (carbamazepine-CR) in terms of efficacy, and well tolerated as first-line monotherapy in patients (>= 16 years of age) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We report primary safety outcomes from the double-blind extension of the noninferiority trial (SP0994; NCT01465997) and post hoc analyses of pooled long-term safety and efficacy data from both trials. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine-CR. Doses were escalated (lacosamide: 200/400/600 mg/d; carbamazepine-CR: 400/800/1200 mg/d) based on seizure control. Eligible patients continued randomized treatment in the extension. Primary outcomes of the extension were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and discontinuations due to TEAEs. Post hoc analyses of data from combined trials included 12- and 24-month seizure freedom and TEAEs by number of comorbid conditions. Results: A total of 886 patients were treated in the initial trial and 548 in the extension; 211 of 279 patients (75.6%) on lacosamide and 180/269 (66.9%) on carbamazepine-CR completed the extension. In the extension, 181 patients (64.9%) on lacosamide and 182 (67.7%) on carbamazepine-CR reported TEAEs; in both groups, nasopharyngitis, headache, and dizziness were most common. Serious TEAEs were reported by 32 patients (11.5%) on lacosamide and 22 (8.2%) on carbamazepine-CR; 12 (4.3%) and 21 (7.8%) discontinued due to TEAEs. In the combined trials (median exposure: lacosamide 630 days; carbamazepine-CR 589 days), Kaplan-Meier estimated proportions of patients with 12- and 24-month seizure freedom from first dose were 50.8% (95% confidence interval 46.2%-55.4%) and 47.0% (42.2%-51.7%) on lacosamide, and 54.9% (50.3%-59.6%) and 50.9% (46.0%-55.7%) on carbamazepineCR. Incidences of drug-related TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs increased by number of comorbid conditions and were lower in patients on lacosamide. Significance: Long-term (median similar to 2 years) lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Seizure freedom rates were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR.
引用
收藏
页码:2437 / 2447
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, VIMPAT LACOSAMIDE SU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, VIMPAT LACOSAMIDE C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, CLIN STUDY SUMMARY R
[4]   PROPOSAL FOR REVISED CLINICAL AND ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES [J].
BANCAUD, J ;
HENRIKSEN, O ;
RUBIODONNADIEU, F ;
SEINO, M ;
DREIFUSS, FE ;
PENRY, JK .
EPILEPSIA, 1981, 22 (04) :489-501
[5]   Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy versus controlled-release carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial [J].
Baulac, Michel ;
Rosenow, Felix ;
Toledo, Manuel ;
Terada, Kiyohito ;
Li, Ting ;
De Backer, Marc ;
Werhahn, Konrad ;
Brock, Melissa .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (01) :43-54
[6]   Long-term safety and efficacy of zonisamide versus carbamazepine monotherapy for treatment of partial seizures in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy: Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind study [J].
Baulac, Michel ;
Patten, Anna ;
Giorgi, Luigi .
EPILEPSIA, 2014, 55 (10) :1534-1543
[7]   Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial [J].
Baulac, Michel ;
Brodie, Martin J. ;
Patten, Anna ;
Segieth, Joanna ;
Giorgi, Luigi .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2012, 11 (07) :579-588
[8]   Efficacy and safety of oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures [J].
Ben-Menachem, Elinor ;
Biton, Victor ;
Jatuzis, Dalius ;
Abou-Khalil, Bassel ;
Doty, Pamela ;
Rudd, G. David .
EPILEPSIA, 2007, 48 (07) :1308-1317
[9]   Safety and tolerability of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset seizures: Analysis of data pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials [J].
Biton, Victor ;
Gil-Nagel, Antonio ;
Isojarvi, Jouko ;
Doty, Pamela ;
Hebert, David ;
Fountain, Nathan B. .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 52 :119-127
[10]   Comparison of levetiracetam and controlled-release carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy [J].
Brodie, M. J. ;
Perucca, E. ;
Ryvlin, P. ;
Ben-Menachem, E. ;
Meencke, H. -J. .
NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (06) :402-408