Long-term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy

被引:31
作者
Ben-Menachem, Elinor [1 ]
Grebe, Hans Peter [2 ]
Terada, Kiyohito [3 ]
Jensen, Lori [4 ]
Li, Ting [4 ]
De Backer, Marc [5 ]
Steiniger-Brach, Bjorn [5 ]
Gasalla, Teresa [4 ]
Brock, Melissa [4 ]
Biton, Victor [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Neurosci & Physiol, Bla Straket 7,Plan 3, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Ctr Hosp Entre Douro & Vouga, Hosp Sao Sebastifio, Dept Neurol, Santa Maria Feira, Portugal
[3] NHO Shizuoka Inst Epilepsy & Neurol Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC USA
[5] UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Clin Trials Inc, Arkansas Epilepsy Program, Little Rock, AR USA
关键词
antiepileptic drug; comorbidity; lacosamide monotherapy; tolerability; PARTIAL-ONSET SEIZURES; DOUBLE-BLIND; ADJUNCTIVE LACOSAMIDE; PHASE-III; TOLERABILITY; THERAPY; ADULTS; MULTICENTER; ZONISAMIDE;
D O I
10.1111/epi.16381
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: A large-scale, double-blind trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) demonstrated that lacosamide was noninferior to controlled-release carbamazepine (carbamazepine-CR) in terms of efficacy, and well tolerated as first-line monotherapy in patients (>= 16 years of age) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We report primary safety outcomes from the double-blind extension of the noninferiority trial (SP0994; NCT01465997) and post hoc analyses of pooled long-term safety and efficacy data from both trials. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine-CR. Doses were escalated (lacosamide: 200/400/600 mg/d; carbamazepine-CR: 400/800/1200 mg/d) based on seizure control. Eligible patients continued randomized treatment in the extension. Primary outcomes of the extension were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and discontinuations due to TEAEs. Post hoc analyses of data from combined trials included 12- and 24-month seizure freedom and TEAEs by number of comorbid conditions. Results: A total of 886 patients were treated in the initial trial and 548 in the extension; 211 of 279 patients (75.6%) on lacosamide and 180/269 (66.9%) on carbamazepine-CR completed the extension. In the extension, 181 patients (64.9%) on lacosamide and 182 (67.7%) on carbamazepine-CR reported TEAEs; in both groups, nasopharyngitis, headache, and dizziness were most common. Serious TEAEs were reported by 32 patients (11.5%) on lacosamide and 22 (8.2%) on carbamazepine-CR; 12 (4.3%) and 21 (7.8%) discontinued due to TEAEs. In the combined trials (median exposure: lacosamide 630 days; carbamazepine-CR 589 days), Kaplan-Meier estimated proportions of patients with 12- and 24-month seizure freedom from first dose were 50.8% (95% confidence interval 46.2%-55.4%) and 47.0% (42.2%-51.7%) on lacosamide, and 54.9% (50.3%-59.6%) and 50.9% (46.0%-55.7%) on carbamazepineCR. Incidences of drug-related TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs increased by number of comorbid conditions and were lower in patients on lacosamide. Significance: Long-term (median similar to 2 years) lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Seizure freedom rates were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR.
引用
收藏
页码:2437 / 2447
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, VIMPAT LACOSAMIDE SU
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, VIMPAT LACOSAMIDE C
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, CLIN STUDY SUMMARY R
  • [4] PROPOSAL FOR REVISED CLINICAL AND ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES
    BANCAUD, J
    HENRIKSEN, O
    RUBIODONNADIEU, F
    SEINO, M
    DREIFUSS, FE
    PENRY, JK
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 1981, 22 (04) : 489 - 501
  • [5] Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy versus controlled-release carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Baulac, Michel
    Rosenow, Felix
    Toledo, Manuel
    Terada, Kiyohito
    Li, Ting
    De Backer, Marc
    Werhahn, Konrad
    Brock, Melissa
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [6] Long-term safety and efficacy of zonisamide versus carbamazepine monotherapy for treatment of partial seizures in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy: Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind study
    Baulac, Michel
    Patten, Anna
    Giorgi, Luigi
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2014, 55 (10) : 1534 - 1543
  • [7] Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Baulac, Michel
    Brodie, Martin J.
    Patten, Anna
    Segieth, Joanna
    Giorgi, Luigi
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2012, 11 (07) : 579 - 588
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures
    Ben-Menachem, Elinor
    Biton, Victor
    Jatuzis, Dalius
    Abou-Khalil, Bassel
    Doty, Pamela
    Rudd, G. David
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2007, 48 (07) : 1308 - 1317
  • [9] Safety and tolerability of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset seizures: Analysis of data pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials
    Biton, Victor
    Gil-Nagel, Antonio
    Isojarvi, Jouko
    Doty, Pamela
    Hebert, David
    Fountain, Nathan B.
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 52 : 119 - 127
  • [10] Comparison of levetiracetam and controlled-release carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy
    Brodie, M. J.
    Perucca, E.
    Ryvlin, P.
    Ben-Menachem, E.
    Meencke, H. -J.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (06) : 402 - 408