Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Evaluating the Response to Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment

被引:61
|
作者
Belli, Paolo [1 ]
Costantini, Melania [1 ]
Ierardi, Carmine [1 ]
Bufi, Enida [1 ]
Amato, Daniele [1 ]
Mule', Antonino [2 ]
Nardone, Luigia [3 ]
Terribile, Daniela [4 ]
Bonomo, Lorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Biosci & Radiol Imaging, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Pathol, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Radiotherapy, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Surg, Breast Unit, I-00168 Rome, Italy
来源
BREAST JOURNAL | 2011年 / 17卷 / 06期
关键词
apparent diffusion coefficient; breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; neoadjuvant treatment; response; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; PATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMIC THERAPY; WATER DIFFUSION; TUMOR RESPONSE; MODEL SYSTEMS; RAT GLIOMA; IN-VIVO;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01160.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the role of diffusion imaging in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment by correlating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value changes with pathological response. From June 2007 to June 2009, all consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (including diffusion sequence) before and after neoadjuvant treatment. The ADC values obtained using two different methods of region of interest (ROI) placement before and after treatment were compared with MRI response (assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria) and pathological response (assessed using Mandard's classification). Fifty-one women (mean age 48.41 years) were included in this study. Morphological MRI (RECIST classification) well evaluated the responder status after chemotherapy (TRG class; area-under-the-curve 0.865). Mean pretreatment ADC values obtained with the two different methods of ROI placement were 1.11 and 1.02 x 10(-3) mm(2)/seconds. Mean post-treatment ADC values were 1.40 and 1.35 x 10(-3) mm(2)/seconds, respectively. A significant inverse correlation between mean ADC increase and Mandard's classifications was observed for both the methods of ADC measurements. Diagnostic performance analysis revealed that the single ROI method has a superior diagnostic accuracy compared with the multiple ROIs method (accuracy: 82% versus 74%). The coupling of the diffusion imaging with the established morphological MRI provides superior evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment in breast cancer patients compared with morphological MRI alone. There is a potential in the future to optimize patient therapy on the basis of ADC value changes. Additional works are needed to determine whether these preliminary observed changes in tumor diffusion are a universal response to tumor cell death, and to more fully delineate the ability of ADC value changes in early recognizing responder from nonresponder patients.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 619
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
    Hu, Xue-Ying
    Li, Ying
    Jin, Guan-Qiao
    Lai, Shao-Lv
    Huang, Xiang-Yang
    Su, Dan-Ke
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (45) : 79642 - 79649
  • [2] Diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing pathological response of tumor in breast cancer subtype to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Liu, Shangang
    Ren, Ruimei
    Chen, Zhaoqiu
    Wang, Yongsheng
    Fan, Tingyong
    Li, Chengli
    Zhang, Pinliang
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (03) : 779 - 787
  • [3] Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Pretreatment Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Park, Sang Hee
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Cho, Nariya
    Song, In Chan
    Chang, Jung Min
    Park, In-Ae
    Han, Wonshik
    Noh, Dong-Young
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (01) : 56 - 63
  • [4] Prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and MRS
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Baek, Hyeon-Man
    Ahn, Jin-Hee
    Baek, Seunghee
    Kim, Hyunji
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Hak Hee
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2012, 25 (12) : 1349 - 1359
  • [5] High-Resolution Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Monitoring Breast Cancer Treatment Response
    Wilmes, Lisa J.
    McLaughlin, Rebekah L.
    Newitt, David C.
    Singer, Lisa
    Sinha, Sumedha P.
    Proctor, Evelyn
    Wisner, Dorota J.
    Saritas, Emine U.
    Kornak, John
    Shankaranarayanan, Ajit
    Banerjee, Suchandrima
    Jones, Ella F.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Hylton, Nola M.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (05) : 581 - 589
  • [6] Diffusion-weighted imaging in monitoring the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Wen Gao
    Ning Guo
    Ting Dong
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 16
  • [7] Diffusion-weighted imaging in monitoring the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Gao, Wen
    Guo, Ning
    Dong, Ting
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 16
  • [8] Assessment of diffusion-weighted MRI in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients
    Nathalie A. Hottat
    Dominique A. Badr
    Sophie Lecomte
    Tatiana Besse-Hammer
    Jacques C. Jani
    Mieke M. Cannie
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [9] Diffusion-weighted MRI in pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
    Richard, Raphael
    Thomassin, Isabelle
    Chapellier, Marion
    Scemama, Aurelie
    de Cremoux, Patricia
    Varna, Mariana
    Giacchetti, Sylvie
    Espie, Marc
    de Kerviler, Eric
    de Bazelaire, Cedric
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (09) : 2420 - 2431
  • [10] Diffusion-weighted MRI in pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
    Raphael Richard
    Isabelle Thomassin
    Marion Chapellier
    Aurélie Scemama
    Patricia de Cremoux
    Mariana Varna
    Sylvie Giacchetti
    Marc Espié
    Eric de Kerviler
    Cedric de Bazelaire
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 2420 - 2431