Factors Affecting Patient Radiation Exposure During Prone and Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

被引:13
作者
Zampini, Anna M. [1 ]
Bamberger, Jacob N. [1 ]
Gupta, Kasmira [1 ]
Gallante, Blair [1 ]
Atallah, William M. [1 ]
Gupta, Mantu [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
PCNL; ultrasound; radiation; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; POSITION;
D O I
10.1089/end.2020.0870
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy poses risks to patients and surgeons. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has traditionally required fluoroscopy, however, the use of ultrasound (US) has decreased radiation exposure. US guidance in supine PCNL (S-PCNL) may further reduce radiation exposure. In this study, we investigate patient and operative factors affecting fluoroscopy time (second), total radiation dose (mGy), and effective dose (ED, mSv) in patients undergoing US-guided S-PCNL or prone PCNL (P-PCNL). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing US-guided PCNL in prone and supine positions. Patients with multiple access tracts, pre-existing renal access, or fluoroscopic renal access were excluded. Patient demographic and radiologic and operative data were collected, and compared between the two groups. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included: 45 P-PCNL and 54 S-PCNL. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Operative time, access location, tract length, and total radiation dose (mGy) also did not differ. S-PCNL was associated with lower ED (2.920.32 mSv vs 5.3 +/- 0.7 mSv, p=0.0014) despite increased fluoroscopy time (86.32 +/- 7.7 seconds vs 51.00 +/- 5.1 seconds, p=0.004), and was more likely a mini-PCNL (35.2% vs 15.9%, p=0.032). In multivariate analysis, S-PCNL remained associated with reduced ED compared with P-PCNL (p=0.002), whereas body mass index (p<0.001) and staghorn calculi (p<0.001) were independently associated with increased ED. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ED in US-guided PCNL is increased in the prone position compared with supine position, and in overweight patients regardless of position. US-guided S-PCNL may decrease radiation exposure to patients and surgeons compared with US-guided P-PCNL.
引用
收藏
页码:1448 / 1453
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Anderson CM., INTRO FLUOROSCOPY SA
[2]   Analysis of factors affecting radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures [J].
Balaji, Sudharsan S. ;
Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ;
Singh, Abhishek G. ;
Ganpule, Arvind P. ;
Sabnis, Ravindra B. ;
Desai, Mahesh R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (03) :514-521
[3]   Reduced Fluoroscopy Protocol for Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy: Feasibility, Outcomes and Effects on Fluoroscopy Time [J].
Blair, Brian ;
Huang, Gene ;
Arnold, Don ;
Li, Roger ;
Schlaifer, Amy ;
Anderson, Kirk ;
Engebretsen, Steven ;
Wallner, Caroline ;
Olgin, Gaudencio ;
Baldwin, D. Duane .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (06) :2112-2116
[4]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[5]   Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation [J].
Chaparian, A. ;
Kanani, A. ;
Baghbanian, M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 39 (01) :32-39
[6]   Ultrasound Guidance for Renal Tract Access and Dilation Reduces Radiation Exposure during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [J].
Chi, Thomas ;
Masic, Selma ;
Li, Jianxing ;
Usawachintachit, Manint .
ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2016, 2016
[7]   Beyond Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Comprehensive Review [J].
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H. ;
Tsakiris, Peter ;
Ferrandino, Michael N. ;
Elsakka, Ahmed M. ;
Rioja, Jorge ;
Preminger, Glenn M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (06) :1262-1269
[8]  
Duncan JR., 2014, TISSUE ATTENUATION X
[9]  
GETERUD K, 1989, ACTA RADIOL, V30, P201
[10]  
Ghearr F.A. N. an., 1998, RADIOGRAPHY, V4, P195, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1078-8174(98)80046-1, 10.1016/S1078-8174, DOI 10.1016/S1078-8174]