Neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide followed by concurrent estramustine and definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Feasibility and preliminary results

被引:29
作者
Ben-Josef, E
Porter, AT
Han, S
Mertens, W
Chuba, P
Fontana, J
Hussain, M
机构
[1] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Div Hematol Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Detroit, MI USA
[6] St John Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2001年 / 49卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer (locally advanced); radiotherapy; chemoradiotherapy; radiosensitization;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01375-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Current therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer is suboptimal, A treatment regimen was designed to improve systemic control by neoadjuvant targeting of hormone-sensitive and -insensitive micrometastatic disease and to improve local control by escalating the biologic effective dose to the prostate using estramustine (EMP) concurrently with radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: Eighteen patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (Stages T3/T4 or T1c/T2b/T2c with a Gleason score of greater than or equal to7 and a serum PSA >15 ng/ml) were entered onto this trial. Therapy consisted of two 21-day cycles of oral estramustine (10 mg/kg/day) in three divided doses and oral etoposide (50 mg/m(2)/day, in two divided doses), followed by concurrent estramustine (10 mg/kg/day, PO) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Results: Two patients required discontinuation of chemotherapy due to development of Grade 3 and 4 toxicity. All others completed both components of therapy per protocol guidelines. Minor toxicities included alopecia (100% of patients), anemia (69%), leukopenia (37%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and nausea (6%) but did not require dose modifications. There were no fatalities. Actuarial 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were 88% and 73%, respectively. Local control rate, assessed by repeated prostate biopsies at 18 months post completion of therapy, was 71%. Conclusion: The described regimen is well tolerated, and preliminary efficacy data are encouraging. The underlying concepts of early targeting of both hormone-sensitive and -insensitive micrometastatic clones, in combination with aggressive local therapy, warrant further investigation. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 703
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin [J].
Bolla, M ;
Gonzalez, D ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Gil, T ;
Collette, L ;
Pierart, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (05) :295-300
[2]   Detection of micrometastatic prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow of patients with prostate cancer [J].
Deguchi, T ;
Yang, M ;
Ehara, H ;
Ito, S ;
Nishino, Y ;
Takahashi, Y ;
Ito, Y ;
Shimokawa, K ;
Tanaka, T ;
Imaeda, T ;
Doi, T ;
Kawada, Y .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (05) :634-638
[3]  
Eklov S, 1996, ANTICANCER RES, V16, P1819
[4]   ESTRAMUSTINE POTENTIATES THE RADIATION EFFECT IN HUMAN PROSTATE TUMOR-TRANSPLANT IN NUDE-MICE [J].
EKLOV, S ;
WESTLIN, JE ;
RIKNER, G ;
NILSSON, S .
PROSTATE, 1994, 24 (01) :39-45
[5]   RADIATION SENSITIZATION BY ESTRAMUSTINE STUDIES ON CULTURED HUMAN PROSTATIC-CANCER CELLS [J].
EKLOV, S ;
ESSAND, M ;
CARLSSON, J ;
NILSSON, S .
PROSTATE, 1992, 21 (04) :287-295
[6]   EFFECT OF TREATMENT ON THE EXPRESSION OF ESTRAMUSTINE-BINDING PROTEIN (EMBP) IN PROSTATIC-CANCER PATIENTS - AN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY [J].
FLUCHTER, SH ;
NELDE, HJ ;
BJORK, P ;
MUNTZING, J ;
BICHLER, KH .
PROSTATE, 1989, 14 (01) :27-43
[7]  
FORSGREN B, 1977, RES STEROIDS, V7, P431
[8]   THE EFFECT OF LOCAL-CONTROL ON METASTATIC DISSEMINATION IN CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - LONG-TERM RESULTS IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH I-125 IMPLANTATION [J].
FUKS, Z ;
LEIBEL, SA ;
WALLNER, KE ;
BEGG, CB ;
FAIR, WR ;
ANDERSON, LL ;
HILARIS, BS ;
WHITMORE, WF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (03) :537-547
[9]  
Ghossein RA, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V78, P10, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<10::AID-CNCR3>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-T