Influencing Consumer Decisions Through Personalization

被引:3
作者
Phillips-Wren, Gloria [1 ]
Wygant, Jeffrey [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21210 USA
[2] Euro RSCG Discovery, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
BRIDGING THE SOCIO-TECHNICAL GAP IN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS: CHALLENGES FOR THE NEXT DECADE | 2010年 / 212卷
关键词
Personalization; decision making; socio-technical; Web; 2.0; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3233/978-1-60750-577-8-152
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Web-based technologies have enabled companies to reach out to their customers and influence decision making in new and different ways. interest and influencing their decision making, and it can be effectively delivered over the Internet. New technologies allow a rich mix of media, interconnected streams of social conversation between users, and one-on-one interaction between the user and the technology delivering the message. These characteristics can be used to influence a decision maker based on research suggesting that consumers will respond more favorably to individualized messages than generalized ones. This paper focuses on socio-technical aspects of personalization by addressing human and technical issues in the implementation and impact of personalization. We provide a Understand-Measure-Deliver theory of personalization and report a case study of a global company that successfully used personalization to influence consumer decisions in the tourism industry. The findings are that customization based on relevant data provides a personalized experience; customers become product designers and product testers with Web 2.0 technologies; and interaction between a human and the technology amplifies user experience.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 162
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Clients and Providers of Outsourcing Services The SerCom and Topps Case Studies [J].
Adam, Frederic ;
Doyle, Eleanor ;
Sammon, David .
JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2008, 17 (01) :153-167
[2]   Personalization technologies: A process-oriented perspective [J].
Adomavicius, G ;
Tuzhilin, A .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2005, 48 (10) :83-90
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ART CASE STUDY RES
[4]  
Ardissono L, 2002, COMMUN ACM, V45, P52, DOI 10.1145/506218.506245
[5]  
Cheverst K, 2002, COMMUN ACM, V45, P47, DOI 10.1145/506218.506244
[7]  
Kennedy Helen, 2008, Information Communication & Society, V11, P307, DOI 10.1080/13691180802025293
[8]   Towards a functional neuroanatomy of self processing: effects of faces and words [J].
Kircher, TTJ ;
Senior, C ;
Phillips, ML ;
Benson, PJ ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Brammer, M ;
Simmons, A ;
Williams, SCR ;
Bartels, M ;
David, AS .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (1-2) :133-144
[9]   The neural correlates of intentional and incidental self processing [J].
Kircher, TTJ ;
Brammer, M ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Simmons, A ;
Bartels, M ;
David, AS .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2002, 40 (06) :683-692
[10]   ENCODING OF PERSONAL INFORMATION - SELF-OTHER DIFFERENCES [J].
KUIPER, NA ;
ROGERS, TB .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (04) :499-514