Low-Carbon Governance, Fiscal Decentralization and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment with Chinese Heavy Pollution Enterprises

被引:15
作者
Guo, Ping [1 ]
Li, Jin [1 ]
Kuang, Jinsong [2 ]
Zhu, Yifei [2 ]
Xiao, Renrui [1 ]
Duan, Donghao [1 ]
Huang, Baocong [3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Sch Econ & Trade, Changsha 410079, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Technol & Business, Sch Econ & Trade, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Changsha 410079, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
low-carbon pilot city; fiscal decentralization; sulfur dioxide emissions; DID; sulfur dioxide treatment input; heavy pollution enterprises; INDUSTRIAL SO2 EMISSIONS; AIR-POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; WATER-POLLUTION; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; MODEL; URBANIZATION; IMPACTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/su14063220
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the effects of enterprise environmental governance under low-carbon pilot policies in China with a difference in differences (DID) design. In examining the development of these policies, we focus on exploring their effects on sulfur dioxide emissions of heavily polluting enterprises based on prefectural city- and firm-level data. Overall, the policies significantly increased enterprise sulfur dioxide emission, and the underlying reason being that investments in carbon dioxide emissions control crowded out investment in sulfur dioxide emission control in enterprises in low-carbon pilot regions. We also find that the implementation of low-carbon pilot policies resulted in greater sulfur dioxide emission from state-owned enterprises and enterprises in western regions than from non-state-owned enterprises and those in eastern regions. It is further found that fiscal decentralization and the associated mediating effect of market segmentation promote enterprises' carbon dioxide emissions control and inhibit their sulfur dioxide emission control. This study helps us re-examine the overall environmental effects of low-carbon policies and has implications for the revision and improvement of environmental governance policies in developing countries.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Law, finance, and economic growth in China [J].
Allen, F ;
Qian, J ;
Qian, MJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) :57-116
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NDRC CHIN POL ACT CL
[3]  
[Anonymous], Ambient air pollution: Pollutants
[4]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[5]   Environmental regulation and labor demand: evidence from the South Coast Air Basin [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 79 (02) :265-295
[6]   WTO Accession and Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes ;
Wang, Luhang ;
Zhang, Yifan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (09) :2784-2820
[7]   Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes ;
Zhang, Yifan .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 97 (02) :339-351
[8]  
Brown R S., 1980, Estimating elasticities of substitution in a model of partial static equilibrium: An application to us agriculture, 1947-1974
[9]   Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China [J].
Bu, Maoliang ;
Qiao, Zhenzi ;
Liu, Beibei .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 89 :10-18
[10]  
Cai W. X., 2019, China Ind. Econ., V1, P137