Surviving Covid-19: The Role of Human Resource Managers in Shaping Organizational Responses to Societal Paradox

被引:22
作者
Branicki, Layla [1 ]
Kalfa, Senia [2 ]
Brammer, Stephen [3 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Business Sch, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[2] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Business Sch, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, Australia
[3] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; TENSIONS; PERSPECTIVE; HRM; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; DIRECTIONS; BUSINESS; INSIGHTS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8551.12570
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the role played by Australian human resource (HR) managers in shaping organizational responses to the Covid-19 pandemic from the perspective of paradox theory. We argue that the Covid-19 crisis triggered a 'societal paradox' - protecting lives and the economy - that cascaded to organizations of all types. While studies suggest paradoxes cross levels of analysis, little is known regarding organizational responses to a societal paradox entailing interdependent and yet contradictory demands between socially significant objectives. We focus on HR managers because of their key role in providing Covid-19 advice and support. Using a combination of cross-sectional survey data (n = 680) and detailed semi-structured interviews (n = 43), we examine variations in HR managers' experience of, and responses to, organizational tensions generated by societal paradox. We find that HR managers play a key role in shaping whether organizational responses 'replicate' the initial societal paradox, or 'magnify' existing latent paradoxical tensions in the organization. We show how applying a societal lens adds insight to paradox theory, elucidate the HR-related mechanisms that underpin variations in organizational experiences/responses and produce an inductive model to guide future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 434
页数:25
相关论文
共 107 条
[2]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[3]  
Aust I., 2017, OXFORD HDB ORG PARAD, P413
[4]   State-of-the-art and future directions for HRM from a paradox perspective: Introduction to the Special Issue [J].
Aust, Ina ;
Brandl, Julia ;
Keegan, Anne .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PERSONALFORSCHUNG, 2015, 29 (3-4) :194-213
[5]   Work-life management tensions in multinational enterprises (MNEs) [J].
Bardoel, E. Anne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (15) :1681-1709
[6]   Transcendence through Rhetorical Practices: Responding to Paradox in the Science Sector [J].
Bednarek, Rebecca ;
Paroutis, Sotirios ;
Sillince, John .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2017, 38 (01) :77-101
[7]   HR ambidexterity and absorptive capacities: A paradox-based approach to HRM capabilities and practice adoption in MNC subsidiaries [J].
Beletskiy, Anton ;
Fey, Carl F. .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 60 (06) :863-883
[8]   On the Practicality of Resisting Pragmatic Paradoxes [J].
Berti, Marco ;
Simpson, Ace Volkmann .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 46 (02) :409-412
[9]   THE RELATIONAL ECOLOGY OF IDENTIFICATION: HOW ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION EMERGES WHEN INDIVIDUALS HOLD DIVERGENT VALUES [J].
Besharov, Marya L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 57 (05) :1485-1512
[10]  
Boeije H., 2010, ANAL QUALITATIVE RES