Prospective, randomized comparison of proximal crescentic and proximal chevron osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus deformity

被引:116
作者
Easley, ME [1 ]
Kiebzak, GM [1 ]
Davis, WH [1 ]
Anderson, RB [1 ]
机构
[1] CAROLINAS MED CTR,DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG,FOOT & ANKLE FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM,CHARLOTTE,NC 28221
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107110079601700603
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, intermetatarsal angle (IMA) correction, functional outcome, and healing time for the proximal crescentic and proximal chevron osteotomies in moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity were prospectively compared. Seventy-five patients (97 feet) were prospectively randomized to either a proximal crescentic or proximal chevron osteotomy for the correction of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity with associated metatarsus primus varus, Criteria for study entry included age (adult patients), IMA greater than or equal to 13 degrees, persistent symptoms despite nonoperative treatment, and minimum follow-up of 12 months. Twenty-nine patients (41 feet) in the crescentic group and 37 patients (43 feet) in the chevron group returned for follow-up at an average of 24 and 20 months, respectively, Good results were achieved with both procedures. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to correction of the IMA or to functional outcome between the two groups. Results held true irrespective of patient age, severity of disease, or bilateral involvement, A statistically significant shorter healing time of the first metatarsal was found after proximal chevron osteotomy, Other potential benefits of the chevron procedure included avoidance of dorsiflexion of the first metatarsal, tendency toward less shortening of the first metatarsal, and more medial distribution of tibial sesamoids following surgery, all of which may reduce the potential for development or persistence of transfer lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 316
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CLIN ORTHOPAEDICS
  • [2] BASAL METATARSAL OSTEOTOMY FOR HALLUX-VALGUS
    BORTON, DC
    STEPHENS, MM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1994, 76B (02): : 204 - 209
  • [3] PROXIMAL METATARSAL OSTEOTOMY IN HALLUX VALGUS
    CEDELL, CA
    ASTROM, M
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 53 (06): : 1013 - 1018
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF WILSON AND HOHMANN OSTEOTOMIES IN THE TREATMENT OF HALLUX VALGUS
    GRACE, D
    HUGHES, J
    KLENERMAN, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1988, 70 (02): : 236 - 241
  • [5] ROENTGENOGRAPHIC AND MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS OF 1ST METATARSAL OSTEOTOMIES FOR METATARSUS PRIMUS VARUS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    JAHSS, MH
    TROY, AI
    KUMMER, F
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE, 1985, 5 (06): : 280 - 321
  • [6] JENSEN NC, 1989, ORTHOPEDICS, V12, P421
  • [7] CLINICAL RATING SYSTEMS FOR THE ANKLE-HINDFOOT, MIDFOOT, HALLUX, AND LESSER TOES
    KITAOKA, HB
    ALEXANDER, IJ
    ADELAAR, RS
    NUNLEY, JA
    MYERSON, MS
    SANDERS, M
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (07) : 349 - 353
  • [8] MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS OF 1ST METATARSAL OSTEOTOMIES
    KUMMER, FJ
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE, 1989, 9 (06): : 281 - 289
  • [9] LEWIS RJ, 1981, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P105
  • [10] OSTEOTOMY OF THE 1ST METATARSAL BASE FOR METATARSUS PRIMUS VARUS
    LIMBIRD, TJ
    DASILVA, RM
    GREEN, NE
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE, 1989, 9 (04): : 158 - 162