A New Hybrid Dynamic FMECA with Decision-Making Methodology: A Case Study in an Agri-Food Company

被引:15
作者
Di Nardo, Mario [1 ]
Murino, Teresa [1 ]
Osteria, Gianluca [1 ]
Santillo, Liberatina Carmela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Chem Mat & Ind Prod Engn DICMAPI, I-80125 Naples, Italy
关键词
FMEA; FMECA; MCDM; entropy method; BWM; EDAS method; system dynamics; SYSTEM FAILURE MODE; RISK-EVALUATION; FUZZY TOPSIS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/asi5030045
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is often used to improve a system's reliability. This paper proposes a new approach that aims to overcome the most critical defects of the traditional FMEA. This new methodology combines the Entropy and Best Worst Method (BWM) methodology with the EDAS and System Dynamics, FMECA: The EN-B-ED Dynamic FMECA. The main innovation point of the proposed work is the presence of an unknown factor (Cost) that allows to obtain an objective weighted factor, a risk index when a machine failure occurs. The criticality analysis has been carried out using software (Vensim PLE x64) to simulate System Dynamics models to identify corrective actions and evaluate the possible implementation of these actions. The methodology proposed is applied to a case study in a relevant Italian company in the agri-food sector.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[2]   Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis [J].
Braglia, M ;
Frosolini, M ;
Montanari, R .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (05) :425-443
[3]  
Braglia M., 2000, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V17, P1017, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02656710010353885, 10.1108/02656710010353885]
[4]   An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA [J].
Carmignani, Gionata .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (04) :861-871
[5]   Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology [J].
Chang, Kuei-Hu .
MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2009, 49 (12) :1586-1596
[6]   Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Poon, Gary Ka Kwai ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2009, 48 (01) :246-256
[7]   Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Poon, Gary Ka Kwai ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (06) :1768-1779
[8]   A Critical Comparison of Alternative Risk Priority Numbers in Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis [J].
Ciani, Lorenzo ;
Guidi, Giulia ;
Patrizi, Gabriele .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :92398-92409
[9]   A comparative critical study between FMEA and FTA risk analysis methods [J].
Cristea, G. ;
Constantinescu, D. M. .
INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF AUTOMOTIVE AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING - MOBILITY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENT (CAR2017), 2017, 252
[10]  
Ebeling CharlesE., 2010, An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering, V2nd