The use of arrays in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening

被引:99
作者
Harper, Joyce C. [1 ,2 ]
Harton, Gary [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, UCL Ctr PG & D, Inst Womens Hlth, London WC1E 6HX, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Inst Womens Hlth, Ctr Reprod & Genet Hlth, London, England
[3] Genet & IVF Inst, Fairfax, VA USA
关键词
PGD; PGS; CGH; array CGH; SNP arrays; mosaicism; embryo biopsy; ART; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; MULTIPLE DISPLACEMENT AMPLIFICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ADVANCED MATERNAL AGE; SINGLE-CELL; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; HUMAN EMBRYOS; PGS; PREGNANCIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.064
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: In preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), polymerase chain reaction has been used to detect monogenic disorders, and in PGD/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to analyze chromosomes. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using FISH-based PGS on cleavage-stage embryos and one on blastocyst-stage embryos have shown that PGS does not increase delivery rates. Is the failure of PGS due to a fundamental flaw in the idea, or are the techniques that are being used unable to overcome their own, inherent flaws? Array-based technology allows for analysis of all of the chromosomes. Two types of arrays are being developed for use in PGD; array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism-based (SNP) arrays. Each array can determine the number of chromosomes, however, SNP-based arrays can also be used to haplotype the sample. Objective(s): To describe aCGH and SNP array technology and make suggestions for the future use of arrays in PGD and PGS. Conclusion(s): If array-based testing is going to prove useful, three steps need to be taken: [1] Validation of the array platform on appropriate cell and tissue samples to allow for reliable testing, even at the single-cell level; [2] deciding which embryo stage is the best for biopsy: polar body, cleavage, or blastocyst stage; [3] performing RCTs to show improvement in delivery rates. If RCTs are able to show that array-based testing at the optimal stage for embryo biopsy increases delivery rates, this will be a major step forward for assisted reproductive technology patients around the world. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010;94:1173-7. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1177
页数:5
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Prospectively randomized controlled trial of PGS in IVF/ICSI patients with poor implantation
    Blockeel, Christophe
    Schutyser, Valerie
    De Vos, Anick
    Verpoest, Willem
    De Vos, Michel
    Staessen, Catherine
    Haentjens, Patrick
    Van der Elst, Josiane
    Devroey, Paul
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 17 (06) : 848 - 854
  • [2] Multiple displacement amplification improves PGD for fragile X syndrome
    Burlet, P.
    Frydman, N.
    Gigarel, N.
    Kerbrat, V.
    Tachdjian, G.
    Feyereisen, E.
    Bonnefont, J. -P.
    Frydman, R.
    Munnich, A.
    Steffann, J.
    [J]. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 12 (10) : 647 - 652
  • [3] Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification
    Dean, FB
    Hosono, S
    Fang, LH
    Wu, XH
    Faruqi, AF
    Bray-Ward, P
    Sun, ZY
    Zong, QL
    Du, YF
    Du, J
    Driscoll, M
    Song, WM
    Kingsmore, SF
    Egholm, M
    Lasken, RS
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (08) : 5261 - 5266
  • [4] Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial
    Debrock, Sophie
    Melotte, Cindy
    Spiessens, Carl
    Peeraer, Karen
    Vanneste, Evelyne
    Meeuwis, Luc
    Meuleman, Christel
    Frijns, Jean-Pierre
    Vermeesch, Joris R.
    D'Hooghe, Thomas M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (02) : 364 - 373
  • [5] Multiple mutation analyses in single tumor cells with improved whole genome amplification
    Dietmaier, W
    Hartmann, A
    Wallinger, S
    Heinmöller, E
    Kerner, T
    Endl, E
    Jauch, KW
    Hofstädter, F
    Rüschoff, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 154 (01) : 83 - 95
  • [6] High resolution array-CGH analysis of single cells
    Fiegler, Heike
    Geigl, Jochen B.
    Langer, Sabine
    Rigler, Diane
    Porter, Keith
    Unger, Kristian
    Carter, Nigel P.
    Speicher, Michael R.
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2007, 35 (03)
  • [7] Accurate and reliable high-throughput detection of copy number variation in the human genome
    Fiegler, Heike
    Redon, Richard
    Andrews, Dan
    Scott, Carol
    Andrews, Robert
    Carder, Carol
    Clark, Richard
    Dovey, Oliver
    Ellis, Peter
    Feuk, Lars
    French, Lisa
    Hunt, Paul
    Kalaitzopoulos, Dimitrios
    Larkin, James
    Montgomery, Lyndal
    Perry, George H.
    Plumb, Bob W.
    Porter, Keith
    Rigby, Rachel E.
    Rigler, Diane
    Valsesia, Armand
    Langford, Cordelia
    Humphray, Sean J.
    Scherer, Stephen W.
    Lee, Charles
    Hurles, Matthew E.
    Carter, Nigel P.
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (12) : 1566 - 1574
  • [8] What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!
    Geraedts, Joep
    Collins, John
    Gianaroli, Luca
    Goossens, Veerle
    Handyside, Alan
    Harper, Joyce
    Montag, Markus
    Repping, Sjoerd
    Schmutzler, Andreas
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 (03) : 575 - 577
  • [9] ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IX: cycles from January to December 2006 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2007
    Goossens, V.
    Harton, G.
    Moutou, C.
    Traeger-Synodinos, J.
    Van Rij, M.
    Harper, J. C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (08) : 1786 - 1810
  • [10] PREGNANCIES FROM BIOPSIED HUMAN PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYOS SEXED BY Y-SPECIFIC DNA AMPLIFICATION
    HANDYSIDE, AH
    KONTOGIANNI, EH
    HARDY, K
    WINSTON, RML
    [J]. NATURE, 1990, 344 (6268) : 768 - 770