An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health

被引:103
作者
Dolan, P [1 ]
Olsen, JA
Menzel, P
Richardson, J
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Econ, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Hlth Econ Grp, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Oslo, Hlth Econ Res Programme, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Tromso, Inst Community Med, Tromso, Norway
[5] Pacific Lutheran Univ, Dept Philosophy, Tacoma, WA 98447 USA
[6] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Program Evaluat, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
preference elicitation; individual utility; social welfare;
D O I
10.1002/hec.760
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There are a number of perspectives that an individual could be asked to adopt in studies designed to elicit preferences for use in informing resource allocation decisions in health care. This paper develops a conceptual framework that clearly distinguishes between six different perspectives. It is argued that the appropriate perspective to use depends on normative considerations and the particular policy context to which it will be applied. We suggest a future research agenda that explicitly addresses these considerations and which involves direct empirical investigation into the effect of perspective on preferences. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 551
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Andersson F, 1999, HEALTH ECON, V8, P369, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199908)8:5<369::AID-HEC456>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-Q
[3]  
[Anonymous], J ETHICS, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009829301765
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality
[5]  
Barry Brian, 1989, THEORIES JUSTICE, VI
[6]  
BINMORE K, 1999, GAME THEORY SOCIAL C
[7]  
De Wit GA, 2000, HEALTH ECON, V9, P109, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200003)9:2<109::AID-HEC503>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-L
[9]  
Dolan P, 2000, HANDB ECON, V17, P1723
[10]  
Dolan P, 1996, HEALTH ECON, V5, P141, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:2<141::AID-HEC189>3.0.CO