Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition

被引:24
作者
Bemister-Buffington, Joseph [1 ]
Wolf, Alex J. [1 ]
Raschka, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Kuhn, Leslie A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Prot Struct Anal & Design Lab, 603 Wilson Rd, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Stat, Med Sci Ctr, 1300 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, 603 Wilson Rd, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
GPCR activity determinants; flexibility analysis; coupled residues; allostery; ProFlex; MLxtend; feature selection; pattern classification; PROTEIN; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.3390/biom10030454
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loops in 18 inactive and 9 active class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These three-dimensional (3D) structures were determined in complex with ligands. However, considering the flexible versus rigid state identified by graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis for each helix and loop segment with the ligand removed, followed by feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification, was sufficient to identify four segments surrounding the ligand binding site whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts whether a GPCR is in an active or inactive state. GPCRs bound to inhibitors were similar in their pattern of flexible versus rigid regions, whereas agonist-bound GPCRs were more flexible and diverse. This new ligand-proximal flexibility signature of GPCR activity was identified without knowledge of the ligand binding mode or previously defined switch regions, while being adjacent to the known transmission switch. Following this proof of concept, the ProFlex flexibility analysis coupled with pattern recognition and activity classification may be useful for predicting whether newly designed ligands behave as activators or inhibitors in protein families in general, based on the pattern of flexibility they induce in the protein.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
FERRI FJ, 1994, MACH INTELL PATT REC, V16, P403
[2]   Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications [J].
Hauser, Alexander S. ;
Attwood, Misty M. ;
Rask-Andersen, Mathias ;
Schioth, Helgi B. ;
Gloriam, David E. .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2017, 16 (12) :829-842
[3]   Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools [J].
Hawkins, Paul C. D. ;
Skillman, A. Geoffrey ;
Nicholls, Anthony .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 50 (01) :74-82
[4]   Identifying protein folding cores from the evolution of flexible regions during unfolding [J].
Hespenheide, BM ;
Rader, AJ ;
Thorpe, MF ;
Kuhn, LA .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2002, 21 (03) :195-207
[5]   Dali server update [J].
Holm, Liisa ;
Laakso, Laura M. .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (W1) :W351-W355
[6]   Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory [J].
Jacobs, DJ ;
Rader, AJ ;
Kuhn, LA ;
Thorpe, MF .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2001, 44 (02) :150-165
[7]   An algorithm for two-dimensional rigidity percolation: The pebble game [J].
Jacobs, DJ ;
Hendrickson, B .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1997, 137 (02) :346-365
[8]   A MODEL RECOGNITION APPROACH TO THE PREDICTION OF ALL-HELICAL MEMBRANE-PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND TOPOLOGY [J].
JONES, DT ;
TAYLOR, WR ;
THORTON, JM .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 33 (10) :3038-3049
[9]   Efficient Drug Lead Discovery and Optimization [J].
Jorgensen, William L. .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 42 (06) :724-733
[10]   Structure-Function of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Superfamily [J].
Katritch, Vsevolod ;
Cherezov, Vadim ;
Stevens, Raymond C. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, VOL 53, 2013, 2013, 53 :531-556