Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer

被引:439
作者
Jones, SE
Erban, J
Overmoyer, B
Budd, GT
Hutchins, L
Lower, E
Laufman, L
Sundaram, S
Urba, WJ
Pritchard, KI
Mennel, R
Richards, D
Olsen, S
Meyers, ML
Ravdin, PM
机构
[1] Texas Oncol, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX 78285 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA
[7] Hematol Oncol Consultants, Columbus, OH USA
[8] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[9] Sharp Rees Steal Med Grp, San Diego, CA USA
[10] Toronto Sunnybrook Reg Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Providence Portland Med Ctr, Portland, OR USA
[12] Sanofi Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.02.027
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, phase III study compared docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer that had progressed after an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 449) were randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (n = 225) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (n = 224) on day 1, every 21 days until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results In the intent-to-treat population, both the median overall survival (OS, 15.4 v 12.7 months; hazard ratio [HRI, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.73; P =.03) and the median time to progression (TTP, 5.7 months v 3.6 months; HR, 1.64; 95% Cl, 1.33 to 2.02; P <.0001) for docetaxel were significantly longer than for paclitaxel, and the overall response rate (ORR, 32% v25%; P =.10) was higher for docetaxel. These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The incidence of treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was greater for docetaxel than for paclitaxel; however, quality-of-life scores were not statistically different between treatment groups over time. Conclusion Docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel in terms of OS and TTP. ORR was higher for docetaxel. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the docetaxel group. The global quality-of-life scores were similar for both agents over time.
引用
收藏
页码:5542 / 5551
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
  • [2] Albain KS, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, p5S
  • [3] ANDREU JM, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P31785
  • [4] Initial paclitaxel improves outcome compared with CMFP combination chemotherapy as front-line therapy in untreated metastatic breast cancer
    Bishop, JF
    Dewar, J
    Toner, GC
    Smith, J
    Tattersall, MHN
    Olver, IN
    Ackland, S
    Kennedy, I
    Goldstein, D
    Gurney, H
    Walpole, E
    Levi, J
    Stephenson, J
    Canetta, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (08) : 2355 - 2364
  • [5] DOCETAXEL (TAXOTERE(R)) - A REVIEW OF PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE .1. PRECLINICAL EXPERIENCE
    BISSERY, MC
    NOHYNEK, G
    SANDERINK, GJ
    LAVELLE, F
    [J]. ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 1995, 6 (03) : 339 - 355
  • [6] Docetaxel vs 5-fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline therapy failure
    Bonneterre, J
    Roché, H
    Monnier, A
    Guastalla, JP
    Namer, M
    Fargeot, P
    Assadourian, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 87 (11) : 1210 - 1215
  • [7] Bontenbal M., 2003, EJC Supplements, V1, pS201, DOI 10.1016/S1359-6349(03)90702-6
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument
    Brady, MJ
    Cella, DF
    Mo, F
    Bonomi, AE
    Tulsky, DS
    Lloyd, SR
    Deasy, S
    Cobleigh, M
    Shiomoto, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) : 974 - 986
  • [9] Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Chan, S
    Friedrichs, K
    Noel, D
    Pintér, T
    Van Belle, S
    Vorobiof, D
    Duarte, R
    Gil, MG
    Bodrogi, I
    Murray, E
    Yelle, L
    von Minckwitz, G
    Korec, S
    Simmonds, P
    Buzzi, F
    Mancha, RG
    Richardson, G
    Walpole, E
    Ronzoni, M
    Murawsky, M
    Alakl, M
    Riva, A
    Crown, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (08) : 2341 - 2354
  • [10] ASSEMBLY OF PURIFIED GDP TUBULIN INTO MICROTUBULES INDUCED BY TAXOL AND TAXOTERE - REVERSIBILITY, LIGAND STOICHIOMETRY, AND COMPETITION
    DIAZ, JF
    ANDREU, JM
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 32 (11) : 2747 - 2755