The influence of plant removal on succession in Wyoming big sagebrush

被引:35
作者
Boyd, C. S. [1 ]
Svejcar, T. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] EOARC, USDA ARS, Burns, OR 97720 USA
关键词
Annual grasses; Artemisia tridentata; Disturbance; Native perennial bunchgrasses; Restoration; Sagebrush steppe; SAGE-GROUSE; PRESCRIBED FIRE; NITROGEN ADDITION; MANAGEMENT; HABITAT; STEPPE; ESTABLISHMENT; RESTORATION; COMMUNITIES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.03.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Restoration treatments are based on the largely untested notion that desired recovery of plant communities following disturbance wouldn't occur in the absence of active intervention. We identified rate of short-term (10 year) floristic changes following removal of plant functional groups in Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities in 1999-2005 and 2008. Treatments imposed on 6 x 6 m plots were: 1) removal of all plant functional groups, 2) perennial grass removal, 3) shrub removal and 4) control. Our data suggest recovery of the shrub component on shrub removal plots could take decades. Similarly, perennial grass cover and density on perennial grass removal plots was less than half that of unaltered plots 10 years after treatment. When all functional groups were removed, cover of annual forbs, annual grasses, and shrubs returned to unaltered levels within ten years or less. Perennial forbs were unaffected (p > 0.05) by treatment. The fact that natural recovery of some components occurred within a relatively short post-disturbance time interval (i.e. <10 years) suggests that intervention may not be necessary for some functional groups. Restoring shrubs in areas dominated by perennial grasses may require targeted reductions of competing perennial grasses. Conversely, shrub dominance may limit perennial grass re-establishment. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 741
页数:8
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P S CHEATGR INV SHRU
[2]  
AUSTIN DD, 1995, GREAT BASIN NAT, V55, P267
[3]   IMPACTS OF MULE DEER AND HORSE GRAZING ON TRANSPLANTED SHRUBS FOR REVEGETATION [J].
AUSTIN, DD ;
URNESS, PJ ;
DURHAM, SL .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1994, 47 (01) :8-11
[4]  
Baker WL, 2006, WILDLIFE SOC B, V34, P177, DOI 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[177:FAROSE]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   PRELAYING NUTRITION OF SAGE GROUSE HENS IN OREGON [J].
BARNETT, JK ;
CRAWFORD, JA .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1994, 47 (02) :114-118
[7]  
BATES J, 2004, RANGE FIELD DAY REPO
[8]   Distribution of carbon and nitrogen in sagebrush steppe after six years of nitrogen addition and shrub removal [J].
Bechtold, H. A. ;
Inouye, R. S. .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2007, 71 (01) :122-132
[9]   Recovery of Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat Features in Wyoming Big Sagebrush following Prescribed Fire [J].
Beck, Jeffrey L. ;
Connelly, John W. ;
Reese, Kerry P. .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2009, 17 (03) :393-403
[10]  
BLAISDELL JP, 1953, TECHNICAL B USDA, V1075