Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning?

被引:121
作者
Molleman, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Management & Org, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
faultline strength; faultline depth; diversity; demographic characteristics; abilities; personality traits; team autonomy; team functioning; cohesion; conflict;
D O I
10.1007/s10726-005-6490-7
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of faultlines within teams on cohesion and conflicts. Faultlines concern the attributes of several team members simultaneously and mirror the structure of diversity within a team. The strength of a faultline indicates the level of similarity within potential subgroups and its width the extent of dissimilarity between them. The faultlines addressed in this study are based upon the demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits of team members. We also address the interaction of team autonomy on the effects of faultlines. Data for this study were collected by means of questionnaires administered to 99 teams of undergraduate students. The results indicate that demographic faultlines directly impair the functioning of a team. Team autonomy conditioned both the relationship between the strength of the ability faultline and team cohesion and the relationship between the depth of the personality faultline and intra-team conflict. In other words, these faultlines are more detrimental to team functioning when team autonomy is high. Ability faultlines seem to emphasize similarities within subgroups, while personality faultlines accentuate dissimilarities between subgroups.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 193
页数:21
相关论文
共 91 条
[61]  
MORRISON DG, 1967, MANAGE SCI, V13, P775, DOI DOI 10.1287/MNSC.13.12.B775
[62]  
MUDRACK PE, 1989, HUM RELAT, V9, P771
[63]   THE RELATION BETWEEN GROUP COHESIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE - AN INTEGRATION [J].
MULLEN, B ;
COPPER, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 115 (02) :210-227
[64]   The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams [J].
Neuman, GA ;
Wagner, SH ;
Christiansen, ND .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 1999, 24 (01) :28-45
[65]   Work design issues in lean production from a sociotechnical systems perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the next step in sociotechnical design? [J].
Niepce, W ;
Molleman, E .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1998, 51 (03) :259-287
[66]   WORK GROUP DEMOGRAPHY, SOCIAL INTEGRATION, AND TURNOVER [J].
OREILLY, CA ;
CALDWELL, DF ;
BARNETT, WP .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1989, 34 (01) :21-37
[67]   Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design [J].
Parker, SK ;
Wall, TD ;
Cordery, JL .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 74 :413-440
[68]   Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance [J].
Pelled, LH ;
Eisenhardt, KM ;
Xin, KR .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1999, 44 (01) :1-28
[69]   Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation [J].
Pelled, LH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 1996, 7 (03) :230-246
[70]   COMPLEX INTERDEPENDENCE IN TASK-PERFORMING GROUPS [J].
SAAVEDRA, R ;
EARLEY, PC ;
VANDYNE, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :61-72