How to interpret systematic reviews with multiple comparisons or network meta-analysis

被引：0

作者：

Labarca, Gonzalo ^{[1
,2
]}

Uribe, Juan P. ^{[3
]}

Majid, Adnan ^{[3
]}

Folch, Erik ^{[4
]}

Fernandez-Bussy, Sebastian ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Concepcion, Fac Med, Concepcion, Chile

[2] Univ San Sebastian, Fac Med, Concepcion, Chile

[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Thorac Surg & Intervent Pulmonol, Boston, MA 02215 USA

[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA

[5] Mayo Clin, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA

来源：

REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE | 2020年 / 148卷 / 01期

关键词：

Evidence-Based Medicine; Meta-Analysis; Methods; Network Meta-Analysis; STEP;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Systematic reviews evaluating multiple interventions can be useful in different clinical situations. However, some concerns arise when more than two interventions are compared and there is a paucity of good quality randomized clinical trials. A novel statistical method based on indirect comparisons, called network meta-analysis (NMA), can be a useful approach to find a clinical answer when multiple interventions are evaluated for the same outcome or comparator. The aim of this review is to describe the main characteristics and provide a user guide for a critical analysis of NMA focusing on its three main domains, namely homogeneity, transitivity and consistency.

引用

页码：109 / 117

页数：9

共 12 条

[1] [Anonymous], EUR RESP J
[2] Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
Bafeta, Aida
Trinquart, Ludovic
Seror, Raphaele
Ravaud, Philippe
[J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
[3] GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networks
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Murad, M. Hassan
Walter, Stephen D.
McLeod, Shelley
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
Rochwerg, Bram
Schunemann, Holger J.
Tomlinson, George
Guyatt, Gordon H.
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 105 : 60 - 67
[4] Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Bonner, Ashley
Alexander, Paul E.
Siemieniuk, Reed A.
Furukawa, Toshi A.
Rochwerg, Bram
Hazlewood, Glen S.
Alhazzani, Waleed
Mustafa, Reem A.
Murad, M. Hassan
Puhan, Milo A.
Schunemann, Holger J.
Guyatt, Gordon H.
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 93 : 36 - 44
[5] First step: the clinical question
Carlos Claro, Juan
Lustig, Nicole
Soto, Mauricio
Rada, Gabriel
[J]. REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2012, 140 (08) : 1067 - 1072
[6] Useful tools and methods for literature retrieval in pubmed: step-by-step guide for physicians
Hevia M, Joaquin
Huete G, Alvaro
Alfaro F, Sandra
Palominos V, Veronica
[J]. REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2017, 145 (12) : 1610 - 1618
[7] CONVINCING EVIDENCE FROM CONTROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED STUDIES ON THE LIPID-LOWERING EFFECT OF A STATIN
Higgins, Julian
[J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (12):
[8] The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
Hutton, Brian
Salanti, Georgia
Caldwell, Deborah M.
Chaimani, Anna
Schmid, Christopher H.
Cameron, Chris
Ioannidis, John P. A.
Straus, Sharon
Thorlund, Kristian
Jansen, Jeroen P.
Mulrow, Cynthia
Catala-Lopez, Ferran
Gotzsche, Peter C.
Dickersin, Kay
Boutron, Isabelle
Altman, Douglas G.
Moher, David
[J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 162 (11) : 777 - 784
[9] Letelier LM, 2005, REV MED CHILE, V133, P246
[10] Clinical guidelines using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)
Mendoza, Carolina
Kraemer, Patricia
Herrera, Paloma
Burdiles, Pamela
Sepulveda, Dino
Nunez, Eliozka
Munoz, Cecilia
Neumann, Ignacio
[J]. REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2017, 145 (11) : 1463 - 1470

← 1 2 →