Customer-centric prioritization of process improvement projects

被引:33
作者
Kreuzer, Thomas [1 ]
Roeglinger, Maximilian [2 ]
Rupprecht, Lea [3 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer FIT, Project Grp Business & Informat Syst Engn, St Augustin, Germany
[2] Univ Bayreuth, FIM Res Ctr, Project Grp Business & Informat Syst Engn, Fraunhofer FIT, Bayreuth, Germany
[3] Univ Augsburg, FIM Res Ctr, Augsburg, Germany
关键词
Business process management; Business process improvement; Process decision-making; Customer centricity; Project portfolio selection; Kano model; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH; SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2020.113286
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Today, customers can conveniently compare products and decide how to interact with companies. With customer centricity becoming an important success factor, companies must drive customer satisfaction not only through excellent products but also through customer-centric processes. As many companies face an abundance of action possibilities, fast-changing customer needs, and scarce resources, guidance regarding the customercentric prioritization of process improvement projects is in high need. As existing approaches predominantly focus on process efficiency, we propose a decision model that accounts for the effects of process improvement on customer centricity in line with justificatory knowledge on value-based process decision-making, project portfolio selection, and the measurement of customer satisfaction. When building the decision model, we adopted the design science paradigm and used multi-criteria decision analysis as well as normative analytical modeling as research methods. We evaluated the model by discussing it with practitioners, by building a software prototype, and by applying it at a German insurance company. Overall, our research extends the prescriptive knowledge on process prioritization and customer process management.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Anderson E.W., 2000, J SERV RES-US, V3, P107, DOI [DOI 10.1177/109467050032001, https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050032001]
[2]  
Anderson EW, 2000, TOTAL QUAL MANAGE, V11, pS869
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[6]  
[Anonymous], P 16 EUR C INF SYST
[7]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[8]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[9]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[10]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]