Consumers Believe That Products Work Better for Others

被引:13
作者
Polman, Evan [1 ,2 ]
Ziano, Ignazio [3 ]
Wu, Kaiyang [1 ]
Van Kerckhove, Anneleen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Mkt, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Business, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Grenoble Ecole Management, Mkt, Grenoble, France
[4] Univ Ghent, Mkt, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
perceived product efficacy; self-other differences; stimulus sampling; linear mixed-effects modeling; perceived uniqueness; perceived malleability; DECISION-MAKING; STATISTICAL POWER; SELF; IMPACT; NEED; UNIQUENESS; CHOICE; GIFT; ENTITATIVITY; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1093/jcr/ucab048
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consumers tend to see themselves in a positive light, yet we present evidence that they are pessimistic about whether they will receive a product's benefits. In 15 studies (N = 6,547; including nine preregistered), we found that consumers believe that product efficacy is higher for others than it is for themselves. For example, consumers believe that consuming a sports drink (to satisfy thirst), medicine (to relieve pain), an online class (to learn something new), or an adult coloring book (to inspire creativity) will have a greater effect on others than on themselves. We show that this bias holds across many kinds of products and judgment-targets, and inversely correlates with factors such as product familiarity, product usefulness, and relationship closeness with judgment-targets. Moreover, we find this bias stems from consumers' beliefs they are more unique and less malleable than others, and that it alters the choices people make for others. We conclude by discussing implications for research on gift-giving, advice-giving, usership, and interpersonal social, health, and financial choices.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 153
页数:22
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Age-related decline in executive function predicts better advice-giving in uncomfortable social contexts [J].
Apfelbaum, Evan P. ;
Krendl, Anne C. ;
Ambady, Nalini .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (06) :1074-1077
[2]   Social Influence in the Retail Context: A Contemporary Review of the Literature [J].
Argo, Jennifer J. ;
Dahl, Darren W. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2020, 96 (01) :25-39
[3]   The Role of(Dis)similarity in (Mis)predicting Others' Preferences [J].
Barasz, Kate ;
Kim, Tami ;
John, Leslie K. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2016, 53 (04) :597-607
[4]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[5]   Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers: A Construal-Level Approach to Gift Giving [J].
Baskin, Ernest ;
Wakslak, Cheryl J. ;
Trope, Yaacov ;
Novemsky, Nathan .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2014, 41 (01) :169-182
[6]   Joint Evaluation as a Real-World Tool for Managing Emotional Assessments of Morality [J].
Bazerman, Max H. ;
Gino, Francesca ;
Shu, Lisa L. ;
Tsay, Chia-Jung .
EMOTION REVIEW, 2011, 3 (03) :290-292
[7]   ON THE SOCIAL NATURE OF NONSOCIAL PERCEPTION - THE MERE OWNERSHIP EFFECT [J].
BEGGAN, JK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (02) :229-237
[8]   POSSESSIONS AND THE EXTENDED SELF [J].
BELK, RW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (02) :139-168
[9]   Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains [J].
Berger, Jonah ;
Heath, Chip .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (02) :121-134
[10]   Red Bull "Gives You Wings" for better or worse: A double-edged impact of brand exposure on consumer performance [J].
Brasel, S. Adam ;
Gips, James .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 21 (01) :57-64