Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study

被引:11
作者
Tjosvoll, Svein O. [1 ]
Mork, Paul J. [2 ]
Iversen, Vegard M. [2 ]
Rise, Marit B. [3 ]
Fimland, Marius S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Neuromed & Movement Sci, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mental Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Unicare Helsefort Rehabil Ctr, Rissa, Norway
关键词
Heavy resistance training; Weekly undulating periodization; Persistent non-specific low back pain; Mixed methods; Feasibility study; Numeric pain rating scale; Pain-related disability; Pain self-efficacy; Muscle strength; AVOIDANCE BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF-EFFICACY QUESTIONNAIRE; MOTOR CONTROL EXERCISES; LOAD LIFTING EXERCISE; PROGRAMS; REHABILITATION; RESPONSIVENESS; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13102-020-00181-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background We investigated the feasibility of a 16-week supervised heavy resistance training program with weekly undulating periodization for individuals with persistent non-specific low-back pain (LBP). Methods Twenty-five adults with persistent non-specific LBP participated in this mixed methods feasibility study. Participants trained a whole-body program consisting of squat, bench press, deadlift and pendlay row two times per week for 16 weeks. We assessed pain intensity, pain-related disability, pain self-efficacy and one-repetition maximum strength at baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks. Three focus group interviews were conducted at the end of the program. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes in outcomes, and the qualitative data was assessed using systematic text condensation. Results We observed clinically meaningful reductions in pain intensity after 8 and 16 weeks of training. The mean difference on the numeric pain rating scale (0-10) in the last 2 weeks from baseline to 8 weeks was 2.6 (95% CI: 1.8-3.6) and from baseline to 16 weeks 3.4 (95% CI: 2.5-4.4). In addition, there were improvements in pain-related disability (3.9, 95% CI: 2.3-5.5), pain self-efficacy (7.7, 95% CI: 5.4-10.1) and muscle strength. In the focus group interviews, participants talked about challenges regarding technique, the importance of supervision and the advantages of periodizing the training. Perceived benefits were improved pain, daily functioning, energy level and sleep, and changes in views on physical activity. Conclusion Periodized resistance training with weekly undulating periodization is a feasible training method for this group of individuals with persistent non-specific LBP. A randomized clinical trial should assess the efficacy of such an intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Individualized Low-Load Motor Control Exercises and Education Versus a High-Load Lifting Exercise and Education to Improve Activity, Pain Intensity, and Physical Performance in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Aasa, Bjorn ;
Berglund, Lars ;
Michaelson, Peter ;
Aasa, Ulrika .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2015, 45 (02) :77-85
[2]  
Baker D., 1994, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, V8, P235, DOI [10.1519/00124278-199411000-00006, DOI 10.1519/00124278-199411000-00006]
[3]   BLOCK VS. WEEKLY UNDULATING PERIODIZED RESISTANCE TRAINING PROGRAMS IN WOMEN [J].
Bartolomei, Sandro ;
Stout, Jeffrey R. ;
Fukuda, David H. ;
Hoffman, Jay R. ;
Merni, Franco .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (10) :2679-2687
[4]   The use of periodized exercise prescription in rehabilitation: a systematic scoping review of literature [J].
Boggenpoel, Blake Yale ;
Nel, Stephan ;
Hanekom, Susan .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (09) :1235-1248
[5]   Low back pain: a call for action [J].
Buchbinder, Rachelle ;
van Tulder, Maurits ;
Oberg, Birgitta ;
Costa, Luciola Menezes ;
Woolf, Anthony ;
Schoene, Mark ;
Croft, Peter .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10137) :2384-2388
[6]  
Buford TW, 2007, J STRENGTH COND RES, V21, P1245
[7]   Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain [J].
Childs, JD ;
Piva, SR ;
Fritz, JM .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) :1331-1334
[8]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[9]   Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions [J].
Foster, Nadine E. ;
Anema, Johannes R. ;
Cherkin, Dan ;
Chou, Roger ;
Cohen, Steven P. ;
Gross, Douglas P. ;
Ferreira, Paulo H. ;
Fritz, Julie M. ;
Koes, Bart W. ;
Peul, Wilco ;
Turner, Judith A. ;
Maher, Chris G. .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10137) :2368-2383
[10]   Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews [J].
Geneen, Louise J. ;
Moore, R. Andrew ;
Clarke, Clare ;
Martin, Denis ;
Colvin, Lesley A. ;
Smith, Blair H. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (04)