Co-production of Digital Services: Definitions, Frameworks, Cases and Evaluation Initiatives - Findings from a Systematic Literature Review

被引:3
作者
Almeida, Gustavo [1 ]
Cappelli, Claudia [2 ]
Maciel, Cristiano [3 ]
Mahecha, Yamile [4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Fluminense Univ UFF, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Rio De Janeiro State UNIRIO, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Mato Grosso UFMT, Cuiaba, Brazil
[4] Fed Rural Univ Rio De Janeiro UFRRJ, Seropedica, Brazil
来源
ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE, EGOVIS 2018 | 2018年 / 11032卷
关键词
Systematic literature review; Co-production; Digital services; CO-CREATION; DESIGN; INNOVATION; PARTICIPATION; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_1
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Customers are no longer passive consumer of products and services and engaged in a more active role in which they influence the organizations, develop and improve products and change the consuming experience [1]. This new role and collaborative trend is often defined as co-production. The present article had as it main objective to survey the models, frameworks, methods, recommendations, evaluations, definitions, concepts, challenges, required conditions, difficulties and learned lessons related to co-production of digital services. We performed a systematic review to identify the literature produced dealing with these questions from 1998 to 2016. Our systematic review followed the protocol recommended by [12]. After the definition of six research questions, we defined the scope of the survey and the related keywords. The search query produced 94 references. Two thematic axis emerged from the data: models and definitions of co-production (57%) and cases, challenges and implementation details (43%). Most articles were published in conferences (26), followed by journals (17). The selected articles were read and the main findings presented. Findings are presented along implications. Suggestions for future research agenda are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 19
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]   Citizen Centric Service in the Australian Department of Human Services: The Department's Experience in Engaging the Community in Co-design of Government Service Delivery and Developments in E-Government Services [J].
Bridge, Colin .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2012, 71 (02) :167-177
[12]  
Christiansson M.T., 2011, 11 EUR C EGOVERMENT
[13]  
Conruyt N., 2013, 2013 7 IEEE INT C DI
[14]   Sign Management for the Future of e-Education: Examples of Collaborative e-Services in a Living Lab [J].
Conruyt, Noel ;
Sebastien, Veronique ;
Sebastien, Olivier ;
Sebastien, Didier ;
Grosser, David .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, AI4KM 2014, 2015, 469 :1-20
[15]  
Eriksén S, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2739, P472
[16]   A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process [J].
Etgar, Michael .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2008, 36 (01) :97-108
[17]  
Fogli D., 2012, P INT WORK C ADV VIS
[18]  
Forsgreen O., 2004, EADOPTION KNOWLEDGE, V1
[19]   Co-designing a digital directory of services [J].
French, Tara ;
Teal, Gemma .
6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING UBIQUITOUS SYSTEMS AND PERVASIVE NETWORKS (EUSPN 2015)/THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT AND FUTURE TRENDS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN HEALTHCARE (ICTH-2015), 2015, 63 :445-450
[20]   Makers and Shapers or Users and Choosers Participatory Practices in Digitalization of Public Sector [J].
Gidlund, Katarina L. .
ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT (EGOV 2015), 2015, 9248 :222-232