Government Intervention, Risk Perception, and the Adoption of Protective Action Recommendations: Evidence from the COVID-19 Prevention and Control Experience of China

被引:102
作者
Duan, Taixiang [1 ]
Jiang, Hechao [2 ]
Deng, Xiangshu [2 ]
Zhang, Qiongwen [2 ]
Wang, Fang [2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Dept Sociol, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Res Inst Social Dev, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
COVID-19; government intervention; risk perception; adoption of PARs; INFLUENZA; MODEL; SARS; BEHAVIORS; SPREAD; H1N1;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17103387
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines the relationships between government interventions, risk perception, and the public's adoption of protective action recommendations (PARs) during the COVID-19 coronavirus disease emergency in mainland China. We conducted quota sampling based on the proportion of the population in each province and gender ratios in the Sixth Census and obtained a sample size of 3837. Government intervention was divided into government communication, government prevention and control, and government rescue. We used multiple regression and a bootstrap mediation effect test to study the mechanism of these three forms of government intervention on the public's adoption of PARs. The results show that government prevention and control and government rescue significantly increased the likelihood of the public adopting PARs. Risk perception was significantly associated with the public's adoption of PARs. The effects of government interventions and risk perception on the public's adoption of PARs was not found to vary by region. Risk perception is identified as an important mediating factor between government intervention and the public's adoption of PARs. These results indicate that increasing the public's risk perception is an effective strategy for governments seeking to encourage the public to adopt PARs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Non-pharmaceutical public health interventions for pandemic influenza: an evaluation of the evidence base [J].
Aledort, Julia E. ;
Lurie, Nicole ;
Wasserman, Jeffrey ;
Bozzette, Samuel A. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 7 (1)
[2]  
Bai Y, 2007, J AGR MECH RES, V23, P1402
[3]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, P158
[4]   Social Factors in Epidemiology [J].
Bauch, Chris T. ;
Galvani, Alison P. .
SCIENCE, 2013, 342 (6154) :47-49
[5]  
Beck U., 2004, RISK SOC
[6]  
Becker M.H., 1974, Health Education Monographs, V2, P326, DOI [10.1177/109019817400200407, DOI 10.1177/109019817400200407]
[7]   Risk perception, optimistic bias, and readiness to change sun related behaviour [J].
Branstrom, Richard ;
Kristjansson, Sveinbjorn ;
Ullen, Henrik .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 16 (05) :492-497
[8]   The Effect of Mask Use on the Spread of Influenza During a Pandemic [J].
Brienen, Nicole C. J. ;
Timen, Aura ;
Wallinga, Jacco ;
van Steenbergen, Jim E. ;
Teunis, Peter F. M. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (08) :1210-1218
[9]   Risk Perceptions and Behaviour: Towards Pandemic Control of Emerging Infectious Diseases International Research on Risk Perception in the Control of Emerging Infectious Diseases [J].
Brug, Johannes ;
Aro, Arja R. ;
Richardus, Jan Hendrik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (01) :3-6
[10]   Risk perception and compliance with quarantine during the SARS outbreak [J].
Cava, MA ;
Fay, KE ;
Beanlands, HJ ;
McCay, EA ;
Wignall, R .
JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2005, 37 (04) :343-347