Photoelastic Study of the Support Structures of Distal-Extension Removable Partial Dentures

被引:8
作者
Costa, Marcio Magno [1 ]
Moreira Rodrigues da Silva, Marco Antonio [2 ]
Goulart Oliveira, Sonia Aparecida [3 ]
Gomes, Vanderlei Luiz [1 ]
Carvalho, Polliane Morais [1 ]
Lucas, Barbara Lima [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Dept Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat, Fac Dent, BR-38401136 Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Restorat Dent, Fac Dent Ribeirao Preto, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Ctr Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Engn, BR-38401136 Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2009年 / 18卷 / 07期
关键词
Photoelastic study; removable partial dentures; distal extension;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00492.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The double system of support, in which the distal-extension removable partial denture adapts, causes inadequate stress around abutment teeth, increasing the possibility of unequal bone resorption. Several ways to reduce or more adequately distribute the stress between abutment teeth and residual ridges have been reported; however, there are no definitive answers to the problem. The purpose of this study was to analyze, by means of photoelasticity, the most favorable stress distribution using three retainers: T bar, rest, proximal plate, I bar (RPI), and circumferential with mesialized rest. Materials and Methods: Three photoelastic models were made simulating a Kennedy Class II inferior arch. Fifteen dentures with long saddles, five of each design, were adjusted to the photoelastic patterns and submitted first to uniformly distributed load, and then to a load localized on the last artificial tooth. The saddles were then shortened and the tests repeated. The quantitative and qualitative analyses of stress intensity were done manually and by photography, respectively. For intragroup analyses the Wilcoxon test for paired samples was used, while for intergroup analyses Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used to better identify the differences (p < 0.05). Results: The RPI retainer, followed by the T bar, demonstrated the best distribution of load between teeth and residual ridge. The circumferential retainer caused greater concentration of stress between dental apexes. Stress distribution was influenced by the type of retainer, the length of the saddle, and the manner of load application. Conclusions: The long saddles and the uniformly distributed loads demonstrated better distribution of stress on support structures.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 595
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条