Multi-label Arabic text categorization: A benchmark and baseline comparison of multi-label learning algorithms

被引:46
作者
Al-Salemi, Bassam [1 ]
Ayob, Masri [1 ]
Kendall, Graham [2 ]
Noah, Shahrul Azman Mohd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Informat Sci & Technol, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Comp Sci, Nottingham, England
关键词
Multi-label learning; Arabic text categorization; RTAnews; Multi-label benchmark; BOOSTING ALGORITHMS; FEATURE-SELECTION; RANKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2018.09.008
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Multi-label text categorization refers to the problem of assigning each document to a subset of categories by means of multi-label learning algorithms. Unlike English and most other languages, the unavailability of Arabic benchmark datasets prevents evaluating multi-label learning algorithms for Arabic text categorization. As a result, only a few recent studies have dealt with multi-label Arabic text categorization on non-benchmark and inaccessible datasets. Therefore, this work aims to promote multi-label Arabic text categorization through (a) introducing "RTAnews", a new benchmark dataset of multi-label Arabic news articles for text categorization and other supervised learning tasks. The benchmark is publicly available in several formats compatible with the existing multi-label learning tools, such as MEKA and Mulan. (b) Conducting an extensive comparison of most of the well-known multi-label learning algorithms for Arabic text categorization in order to have baseline results and show the effectiveness of these algorithms for Arabic text categorization on RTAnews. The evaluation involves four multi-label transformation-based algorithms: Binary Relevance, Classifier Chains, Calibrated Ranking by Pairwise Comparison and Label Powerset, with three base learners (Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors and Random Forest); and four adaptation-based algorithms (Multi-label kNN, Instance-Based Learning by Logistic Regression Multi-label, Binary Relevance kNN and RFBoost). The reported baseline results show that both RFBoost and Label Powerset with Support Vector Machine as base learner outperformed other compared algorithms. Results also demonstrated that adaptation-based algorithms are faster than transformation-based algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 227
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Modeling Arabic subjectivity and sentiment in lexical space [J].
Abdul-Mageed, Muhammad .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 56 (02) :291-307
[2]  
AHA DW, 1991, MACH LEARN, V6, P37, DOI 10.1007/BF00153759
[3]   My Code in My Native Tone: Cha Script [J].
Ahmed, Nova ;
Kamal, Arman ;
Nuruddin, Adnan ;
Jishan, Syed Tanveer .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND DEVELOPMENT (ICTD 2016), 2016,
[4]   Feature ranking for enhancing boosting-based multi-label text categorization [J].
Al-Salemi, Bassam ;
Ayob, Masri ;
Noah, Shahrul Azman Mohd .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 113 :531-543
[5]   RFBoost: An improved multi-label boosting algorithm and its application to text categorisation [J].
Al-Salemi, Bassam ;
Noah, Shahrul Azman Mohd ;
Ab Aziz, Mohd Juzaiddin .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2016, 103 :104-117
[6]   Boosting algorithms with topic modeling for multi-label text categorization: A comparative empirical study [J].
Al-Salemi, Bassam ;
Ab Aziz, Mohd. Juzaiddin ;
Noah, Shahrul Azman .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2015, 41 (05) :732-746
[7]   LDA-AdaBoost.MH: Accelerated AdaBoost.MH based on latent Dirichlet allocation for text categorization [J].
Al-Salemi, Bassam ;
Ab Aziz, Mohd. Juzaiddin ;
Noah, Shahrul Azman .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2015, 41 (01) :27-40
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, DOI 10.1145/1656274.1656278
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, P 12 ACM SIGKDD INT
[10]  
[Anonymous], IDC iView: IDC Analyze the future