Is Corporate Tax Aggressiveness a Reputation Threat? Corporate Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Tax Behavior

被引:57
作者
Baudot, Lisa [1 ]
Johnson, Joseph A. [1 ]
Roberts, Anna [2 ]
Roberts, Robin W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Kenneth G Dixon Sch Accounting, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Corporate accountability; Corporate tax behavior; Corporate reputation; AVOIDANCE; PERFORMANCE; LEGITIMACY; CSR; MANAGEMENT; CONSEQUENCES; INSTITUTIONS; ANTECEDENTS; DIMENSIONS; HYPOCRISY;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-019-04227-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we consider the relationships among corporate accountability, reputation, and tax behavior as a corporate social responsibility issue. As part of our investigation, we provide empirical examples of corporate reputation and corporate tax behaviors using a sample of large, U.S.-based multinational companies. In addition, we utilize corporate tax controversies to illustrate possibilities for aggressive corporate tax behaviors of high-profile multinationals to become a reputation threat. Finally, we consider whether reputation serves as an accountability mechanism for corporate tax behaviors among other mechanisms for holding firms accountable for corporate tax behaviors. Our conceptual work points to a complicated relationship among shareholder, stakeholder, and civic responsibilities in the development and execution of firm's corporate tax strategies. Building on those insights, our empirical illustration considers corporate reputation data alongside data which reflects corporate tax behavior. Based on this work, we find no clear trend or pattern indicating that reputation is associated with or affected by certain types of corporate tax behaviors. That is, our exploratory empirical illustration suggests that corporate tax behavior does not produce broad reputational consequences that would motivate a change in firm behavior. Drawing from celebrity and strategic silence research, we then suggest that reputation may not be a well-functioning mechanism for holding corporations to account for contributing their fair share of the resources used by government for the benefit of society and offer-related theoretical insights.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 215
页数:19
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   I Love That Company: Look How Ethical, Prominent, and Efficacious It IsA Triadic Organizational Reputation (TOR) Scale [J].
Agarwal, James ;
Stackhouse, Madelynn ;
Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 153 (03) :889-910
[2]  
Agarwal J, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V130, P485, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2232-6
[3]  
[Anonymous], TAX POL OBJ
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, I ORG IDEAS INTEREST
[5]  
[Anonymous], PRIORITIZING SUSTAIN
[6]  
[Anonymous], OFFSH SHELL GAM 2017
[7]  
[Anonymous], BOARD M HAND DISCL F
[8]  
[Anonymous], W13756 NBER
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
[10]  
[Anonymous], UK TAX STRAT