Seismic performances of magnetorheological flag-shaped damping braced frame structures

被引:7
作者
Xu, Long-He [1 ]
Xie, Xing-Si [1 ]
Li, Zhong-Xian [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Coast Civil Struct Safety China Minist Ed, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
steel frame structure; self-centering brace; magnetorheological fluid; seismic performance; residual deformation; STEEL FRAME; DESIGN; VALIDATION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-665X/ab8c28
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
This paper studies the seismic performances of buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF), magnetorheological self-centering braced frame (MR-SCBF) and variable damping self-centering braced frame (VD-SCBF). The working principles of MR-SCB and VD-SCB are presented and validated by the cyclic testing. The MR-SCB and VD-SCB exhibit full flag-shaped and quasi-flag-shaped hysteretic responses, respectively. Based on the experimental results, a modified Bouc-Wen based model of the MR-SCB and VD-SCB is proposed to simplify the simulation. Two types of 15-story braced frames are simulated to analyze the displacement responses and residual deformations under five natural ground motions with different peak ground acceleration (PGA) levels. The interstory drift and residual deformation ratios of MR-SCBFs and VD-SCBFs are all less than those of BRBFs under mega ground motions. The maximum interstory drift ratios of BRBFs, MR-SCBFs and VD-SCBFs under the PGA = 0.588 g earthquakes are 4.65%, 4.03% and 4.09%, respectively, and the maximum residual deformation ratios under the PGA = 0.4 g earthquakes are 0.51%, 0.18% and 0.23%, respectively. For better response control, the VD-SCB is suitable for frame structures with non-moment-resisting beam-column connections, while the MR-SCB is recommended for all-rigidly connected frame.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Validation of a steel dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB) for seismic resistance: from brace member to one-story one-bay braced frame tests [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chung, Ping-Ting ;
Wu, Tsung-Han ;
Beato, Alexis Rafael Ovalle .
FRONTIERS OF STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 10 (03) :303-311
[2]   Seismic design and tests of a full-scale one-story one-bay steel frame with a dual-core self-centering brace [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Wu, Tsung-Han ;
Beato, Alexis Rafael Ovalle ;
Chung, Ping-Ting ;
Chen, Ying-Chuan .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 111 :435-450
[3]   Steel braced frames with dual-core SCBs and sandwiched BRBs: Mechanics, modeling and seismic demands [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chen, Ying-Chuan ;
Dinh-Hai Pham ;
Vu-Minh Truong .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 72 :26-40
[4]   Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chen, Sheng-Yang .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (08) :2108-2121
[5]   Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction [J].
Dyke, SJ ;
Spencer, BF ;
Sain, MK ;
Carlson, JD .
SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1996, 5 (05) :565-575
[6]   Computational study of self-centering buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance [J].
Eatherton, Matthew R. ;
Fahnestock, Larry A. ;
Miller, David J. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (13) :1897-1914
[7]   Shake table testing and numerical simulation of a self-centering energy dissipative braced frame [J].
Erochko, Jeffrey ;
Christopoulos, Constantin ;
Tremblay, Robert ;
Kim, Hyung-Joon .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (11) :1617-1635
[8]   Application of hybrid-simulation to fragility assessment of the telescoping self-centering energy dissipative bracing system [J].
Kammula, Viswanath ;
Erochko, Jeffrey ;
Kwon, Oh-Sung ;
Christopoulos, Constantin .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (06) :811-830
[9]   Development and experimental validation of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace [J].
Miller, David J. ;
Fahnestock, Larry A. ;
Eatherton, Matthew R. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 40 :288-298
[10]   A low-tech dissipative buckling restrained brace. Design, analysis, production and testing [J].
Palazzo, G. ;
Lopez-Almansa, F. ;
Cahis, X. ;
Crisafulli, F. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (09) :2152-2161