Drivers and barriers of eco-innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective

被引:233
作者
Kiefer, Christoph P. [1 ]
Del Rio Gonzalez, Pablo [1 ]
Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Inst Publ Policies & Goods IPP, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Alcala UAH, Inst Publ Policies & Goods IPP, Madrid, Spain
关键词
circular economy; eco-innovation; resource-based view; small and medium-size enterprises; Spain; sustainability transition; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; TECHNOLOGY-PUSH; SUPPLY CHAIN; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; GREEN PRACTICES; DEMAND-PULL; PRODUCT; DETERMINANTS; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2246
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Firms are influenced by internal factors (resources and capabilities) and external factors (e.g., regulation) when taking the decision to eco-innovate. However, the analysis of the internal factors has received much less attention than the external ones. This paper aims to fill this gap in the literature by analyzing the role of resources, competences, and dynamic capabilities (RCCs) as determinants (drivers and barriers) of different eco-innovation (EI) types. Those EI types contribute differently to the sustainable transition of the economy and society, that is, towards the circular economy. The statistical analyses reveal that RCCs are quite relevant as determinants of EIs, and that different RCCs are more or less relevant for different EI types. In particular, the determinants of systemic and radical EIs substantially differ from those for continuous improvements. Our results suggest that physical RCCs, involvement in green supply chains, an EI-friendly corporate culture, technology-push and market-pull, and internal financing resources represent drivers to these EIs, whereas cooperation, organizational learning, an ISO (International Organization for Standardization) ecological certification, and technological path dependency are barriers. The results may guide firms to pursue competitive and sustainable advantage by innovating through certain EI types corresponding to available and dedicated RCCs. They may also be useful to policy makers who are willing to promote specific EI types.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 172
页数:18
相关论文
共 136 条
[21]   Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms [J].
Cainelli, Giulio ;
De Marchi, Valentina ;
Grandinetti, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 94 :211-220
[22]   A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size [J].
Camisón-Zornoza, C ;
Lapiedra-Alcamí, R ;
Segarra-Ciprés, M ;
Boronat-Navarro, M .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2004, 25 (03) :331-361
[23]   Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies [J].
Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier ;
del Rio, Pablo ;
Konnola, Totti .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (10-11) :1073-1083
[24]   A taxonomy of green innovators: Empirical evidence from South Korea [J].
Castellacci, Fulvio ;
Lie, Christine Mee .
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 143 :1036-1047
[25]   The relevance of innovation leadership for environmental benefits: A firm-level empirical analysis on French firms [J].
Chassagnon, Virgile ;
Haned, Naciba .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 91 :194-207
[26]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[27]  
Cohendet P., 1998, THEORY FIRM EVOLUTIO
[28]   Drivers of green and non-green innovation: empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs [J].
Cuerva, Maria C. ;
Triguero-Cano, Angela ;
Corcoles, David .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 68 :104-113
[29]   Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: the case of Italian manufacturing firms [J].
De Marchi, Valentina ;
Grandinetti, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 17 (04) :569-582
[30]   Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms [J].
De Marchi, Valentina .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (03) :614-623