Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial

被引:31
作者
Wang, Yanan [1 ]
Deng, Haijun [1 ]
Mou, Tingyu [1 ]
Li, Junmeng [1 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ]
Zhou, Haipeng [1 ]
Li, Guoxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, 1838 North Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2019年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
Short-term outcomes; Single-incision plus one-port; Laparoscopic surgery; Rectosigmoid cancer; Randomized controlled trial; COMPLETE MESOCOLIC EXCISION; ONE ADDITIONAL PORT; COLON-CANCER; ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTAL-CANCER; REDUCED-PORT; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CLASICC TRIAL; COLECTOMY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6350-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveThe objective of the study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port surgery (SILS+1) compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colonic cancer.BackgroundAt present, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy remains technically challenging. The use of SILS+1 as an alternative has gained increasing attention; however, its safety and efficacy remain controversial.Methods and patientsBetween April 2014 and July 2016, 198 patients with clinical stage T1-4aN0-2 M0 rectosigmoid cancer were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to either SILS+1 (n=99) or CLS (n=99). The morbidity and mortality within 30days, operative and pathologic outcomes, postoperative recovery course, inflammation and immune responses, and pain intensity were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in overall complications between the two groups (17.2 vs. 16.3%, P=1.000). The total operating time for the SILS+1 group was significantly shorter (100.830.4 vs. 116.6 +/- 36.6, P=0.002). Blood loss was significantly greater in the CLS group (20 vs. 50, P<0.001). Thirteen patients (14%) in the CLS group required additional postoperative analgesics, which was significantly more than four patients in the SILS+1 group. Notably, on postoperative day three, the visual analogue scale score of the CLS group was greater than that of the SILS+1 group (1.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 1.3, P=0.023). Tumor diameter, pathologic stage, length of the proximal and distal margins, and number of lymph nodes harvested were similar, other values were also similar between the two groups.Conclusion Our findings suggest that SILS+1 might be safe and feasible for rectosigmoid cancer when performed by experienced surgeons. It offers minimal invasiveness without compromising oncologic treatment principles. Trial Registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02117557).
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 848
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Bonjer HJ, 2009, LANCET ONCOL, V10, P44, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3
[2]   Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484
[3]   Single-incision versus standard multi-incision laparoscopic colectomy in patients with malignant or benign colonic disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of the evidence [J].
Brockhaus, Anne Catharina ;
Sauerland, Stefan ;
Saad, Stefan .
BMC SURGERY, 2016, 16 :1-10
[4]   Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy [J].
Bucher, Pascal ;
Pugin, Francois ;
Morel, Philippe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 23 (10) :1013-1016
[5]   Single-Incision Versus Standard Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy A Multicenter, Case-Controlled Comparison [J].
Champagne, Bradley J. ;
Papaconstantinou, Harry T. ;
Parmar, Stavan S. ;
Nagle, Deborah A. ;
Young-Fadok, Tonia M. ;
Lee, Edward C. ;
Delaney, Conor P. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (01) :66-69
[6]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[7]   Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost [J].
Fujii, Shoichi ;
Watanabe, Kazuteru ;
Ota, Mitsuyoshi ;
Watanabe, Jun ;
Ichikawa, Yasushi ;
Yamagishi, Shigeru ;
Tatsumi, Kenji ;
Suwa, Hirokazu ;
Kunisaki, Chikara ;
Taguri, Masataka ;
Morita, Satoshi ;
Endo, Itaru .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (05) :1403-1411
[8]   SINGLE-INCISION PLUS ONE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR RECTAL CANCER AS A REDUCED PORT SURGERY [J].
Hirano, Y. ;
Hattori, M. ;
Douden, K. ;
Shimizu, S. ;
Sato, Y. ;
Maeda, K. ;
Hashizume, Y. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 101 (04) :283-286
[9]  
Hirano Y, 2017, DIG SURG
[10]  
Hirano Y, 2016, WORLD J GASTRO SURG, V8, P95, DOI [10.4240/wjgs.v8.i11.95, 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.95]