Investment efficiency of urban infrastructure systems: Empirical measurement and implications for China

被引:17
作者
Cheng, Min [1 ]
Lu, Yujie [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Res Inst Engn & Project Management, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Sch Management, Shanghai 200041, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Design & Environm, Dept Bldg, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Infrastructure; Investment efficiency; China; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Malmquist productivity index (MPI); Efficiency change; MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVITY INDEX; DEA WINDOW ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; EVOLUTION; INDUSTRY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.10.008
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Infrastructure investment is vital to a nation's long-term development and its performance needs to be carefully evaluated to ensure the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of infrastructure decisions. Though some studies attempt to evaluate the development level of infrastructure systems, most of them focus on economic influence but neglect other aspects such as societal benefits. To advance the accuracy of the current method, we expanded a multi-attribute evaluation framework based on a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based Malmquist productivity index (MPI) to evaluate the longitudinal efficiency of China's infrastructure investment. The statistical data from 2004 to 2014 in 30 provincial-level administrative divisions were collected as inputs and outputs of the model for a dynamic cross-provincial comparison. We found that, firstly, the overall efficiency of infrastructure investment during the study periods was improved by 2.4% and the increase was primarily due to technical change rather than efficiency change. Secondly, an uneven distribution of the efficiency level existed among different regions, with the eastern region as the best performance of an average MPI of 1.067 and the western region being the lowest. Thirdly, each provincial-level administrative division exhibited a distinctive changing profile over the period, with Beijing (20.5%) and Shanghai (20.4%) as the fastest growing provinces yet Shandong the slowest (13.1%). The yearly change, its interpretation and in-depth analysis of MPI's decomposition have also been discussed. The proposed approach and findings can provide insights for making long term investment strategies and infrastructure policies in China and similar countries.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 102
页数:12
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Akyelken N., 2015, REG STUD, V49, P1
[2]   EMPIRICAL IMPACT OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ON THE JAPANESE ECONOMY [J].
Annala, Christopher N. ;
Batina, Raymond G. ;
Feehan, James P. .
JAPANESE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 59 (04) :419-437
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, China Statistical Yearbook
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, WORLD DEV REPORT 199
[5]   Does infrastructure investment lead to economic growth or economic fragility? Evidence from China [J].
Ansar, Atif ;
Flyvbjerg, Bent ;
Budzier, Alexander ;
Lunn, Daniel .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 32 (03) :360-390
[6]   IS PUBLIC-EXPENDITURE PRODUCTIVE [J].
ASCHAUER, DA .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1989, 23 (02) :177-200
[7]   Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry [J].
Asmild, M ;
Paradi, JC ;
Aggarwall, V ;
Schaffnit, C .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :67-89
[8]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[9]  
Barros C.P., 2004, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, V11, P269
[10]   Do infrastructures influence the convergence of efficiency in Mexico? [J].
Becerril-Torres, Osvaldo U. ;
Alvarez-Ayuso, Inmaculada C. ;
Del moral-Barrera, Laura E. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2010, 32 (01) :120-137