Enamel thickness and development in a third permanent molar of Gigantopithecus blacki

被引:42
作者
Dean, MC
Schrenk, F
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Anat & Dev Biol, Evolut Anat Unit, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Res Inst Senkenberg, Dept Palaeoanthropol, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Gigantopithecus; enamel thickness; teeth; enamel microstructure; cross striations;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.08.009
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
A ground section was prepared from a lower right M3 attributed to Gigantopithecus blacki as close as possible to axial plane of the mesial cusps. Daily cross striations were imaged, measured and counted in each cusp using polarised light microscopy. Long-period striae of Retzius were counted in the lateral enamel and their periodicity determined from counts and measurements of daily cross striations between adjacent striae. Cross striation spacings in the cusps were between 3.8 mum at the enamel dentine junction and 6 mum close to the enamel surface. Cuspal enamel formation times were long (800 days in the protoconid and 620 days in the metaconid). Linear enamel thickness was as much as 3.75 mm in the protoconid. There were 63 and 61 long-period striae of Retzius in the mesial aspects of the lateral enamel and the periodicity was I I days. Lateral enamel formation took 1493 and 1291 days and when summed with cuspal enamel formation times totalled 4 years in the protoconid and 3.5 in the metaconid. Relative enamel thickness was 23, calculated through the mesial cusps. This falls short of that in the so-called 'thick hyper-thick' enamel described in 'robust' australopithecines to which Gigantopithecus blacki has previously been compared in both its dental and mandibular morphology. With respect to enamel thickness, therefore, Gigantopithecus blacki falls squarely among an increasingly large number of Miocene hominoids that can all be described as having 'thick enamel'. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 387
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Comparative dental development and microstructure of Proconsul teeth from Rusinga Island, Kenya [J].
Beynon, AD ;
Dean, MC ;
Leakey, MG ;
Reid, DJ ;
Walker, A .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 1998, 35 (02) :163-209
[2]   PROBLEMS OF BODY-WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN FOSSIL PRIMATES [J].
CONROY, GC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 1987, 8 (02) :115-137
[3]   Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins [J].
Dean, C ;
Leakey, MG ;
Reid, D ;
Schrenk, F ;
Schwartz, GT ;
Stringer, C ;
Walker, A .
NATURE, 2001, 414 (6864) :628-631
[4]  
DELSON E, 1979, EVOLUTIONARY HIST PR
[5]  
Fleagle J.G., 1999, PRIMATE ADAPTATION E
[6]   ALLOMETRIC SCALING IN THE DENTITION OF PRIMATES AND PREDICTION OF BODY-WEIGHT FROM TOOTH SIZE IN FOSSILS [J].
GINGERICH, PD ;
SMITH, BH ;
ROSENBERG, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1982, 58 (01) :81-100
[7]  
Grine F.E., 1988, P3
[8]  
Kelley J., 2001, DENT MORPHOLOGY 2001, P123
[9]   ENAMEL THICKNESS AND THE HELICOIDAL OCCLUSAL PLANE [J].
MACHO, GA ;
BERNER, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1994, 94 (03) :327-337
[10]   ENAMEL THICKNESS OF HUMAN MAXILLARY MOLARS RECONSIDERED [J].
MACHO, GA ;
BERNER, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1993, 92 (02) :189-200