Evaluating the Social Sustainability Criteria of Supply Chain Management in Manufacturing Industries: A Role of BWM in MCDM

被引:0
作者
Khokhar, Maryam [1 ]
Hou, Yumei [1 ]
Rafique, Muhammad Asim [1 ]
Iqbal, Wasim [1 ]
机构
[1] Yanshan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, Peoples R China
来源
PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU | 2020年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
Supply Chain Social sustainability (SCSS); Best Worst Method (BWM); Multi-Criteria Decision-making Method (MCDM); Manufacturing Industries; PERFORMANCE; MULTICRITERIA; INDICATORS; PRESSURE; GREEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Supply chain management firms are gradually pressurized to incorporate social sustainability practices to address social issues. Though, the researchers emphasized on different dimensions of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), i.e., social, environmental and economic but fewer considered the social aspect of sustainability. The purpose of this research is to take into account the social dimension of sustainability into manufacturing industries. The social dimension of sustainability as compared to other sustainable, has severe adverse impact across supply chains In order to demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of social sustainability in supply chain management, a sample of 53 practitioners of Pakistani manufacturing companies has been selected to prioritize and evaluate the SCSS criteria by applying a decision-making multi-criteria method called the best worst method (BWM). The criteria of the study are ranked according to their average weight achieved through BWM. The criterion employment practices has been chosen as the most significant criterion while cultural values criterion is considered as least important. The results of this study are helpful for industry managers, practitioners and decision-makers to take the decisions for the implementation of social criteria to enhance the social sustainability that lead to sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 194
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development
    Aboutorab, Hamed
    Saberi, Morteza
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    Hussain, Omar
    Chang, Elizabeth
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 107 : 115 - 125
  • [2] A Quantitative Approach for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Corporations
    Ahi, Payman
    Searcy, Cory
    Jaber, Mohamad Y.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 152 : 336 - 346
  • [3] Sustainability indicators for manufacturing sectors A literature survey and maturity analysis from the triple-bottom line perspective
    Ahmad, Shamraiz
    Wong, Kuan Yew
    Rajoo, Srithar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 30 (02) : 312 - 334
  • [4] The influence of external factors on supply chain sustainability goals of the oil and gas industry
    Ahmad, Wan Nurul K. Wan
    Rezaei, Jafar
    de Brito, Marisa P.
    Tavasszy, Lorant A.
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2016, 49 : 302 - 314
  • [5] Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method
    Ahmadi, Hadi Badri
    Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 126 : 99 - 106
  • [6] Modeling Social Life Cycle Assessment framework for the Italian wine sector
    Arcese, Gabriella
    Lucchetti, Maria Claudia
    Massa, Ilaria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 1027 - 1036
  • [7] Influence of Green and Lean Upstream Supply Chain Management Practices on Business Sustainability
    Azevedo, Susana G.
    Carvalho, Helena
    Duarte, Susana
    Cruz-Machado, V.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 59 (04) : 753 - 765
  • [8] Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions
    Brandenburg, Marcus
    Govindan, Kannan
    Sarkis, Joseph
    Seuring, Stefan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 233 (02) : 299 - 312
  • [9] Social desirability and sustainable food research: A systematic literature review
    Cerri, Jacopo
    Thogersen, John
    Testa, Francesco
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2019, 71 : 136 - 140
  • [10] Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: a SME perspective
    Ciliberti, Francesco
    Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo
    Scozzi, Barbara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (15) : 1579 - 1588