The Effect of Adding a Background Infusion to Patient-Controlled Epidural Labor Analgesia on Labor, Maternal, and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:55
作者
Heesen, Michael [1 ]
Boehmer, Johannes [2 ]
Kloehr, Sven [2 ]
Hofmann, Thomas [2 ]
Rossaint, Rolf [3 ]
Straube, Sebastian [4 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital Baden, Dept Anaesthesia, Baden, Switzerland
[2] Klinikum Bruderwald, Dept Anesthesiol, D-96049 Bamberg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Aachen, Dept Anesthesiol, Aachen, Germany
[4] Univ Alberta, Div Prevent Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
ROPIVACAINE; PCEA; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; POTENCIES; TRIAL; BOLUS;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000000743
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has gained popularity, but it is still unclear whether adding a background infusion confers any benefit. METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and ISI WOS was performed to identify randomized controlled double-blind trials that compare PCEA-only with PCEA combined with a continuous infusion (PCEA + CI) in parturients. The data were subjected to meta-analyses using the random-effects model. Our primary outcome was the incidence of instrumental vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes were incidences of spontaneous vaginal and cesarean deliveries, duration of labor, analgesic outcomes, maternal outcomes (visual analog scale scores for pain, maternal satisfaction, nausea, pruritus, hypotension), and neonatal outcomes (Apgar score, umbilical artery pH). RESULTS: We identified 7 trials with a low risk of bias, reporting on 891 parturients, for inclusion in our systematic review. The risk of instrumental vaginal delivery was increased in the PCEA + CI group, risk ratio (RR) 1.66 (95% confidence interval 1.08-2.56, P = 0.02; I-2 = 0%); the RR for cesarean delivery was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.61-1.13, I-2 = 0%). The second stage of labor was prolonged (weighted mean difference 12.3 minutes, 95% confidence interval 5.1-19.5 minutes, P = 0.0008; I-2 = 0%) in the PCEA + CI group. Fewer patients in the PCEA + CI group required physician-administered boluses (RR 0.35 [95% confidence interval 0.25-0.47, P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%]). No differences regarding maternal adverse events (nausea, pruritus, hypotension) or neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores <7, umbilical artery pH) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of current evidence, no conclusion can be drawn regarding the risks or benefits of adding a continuous background infusion to PCEA compared with PCEA-only epidural labor analgesia. Further high-quality studies involving a sufficient number of patients are required.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 158
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Efficacy and safety of epidural clonidine by continuous infusion or patient-controlled analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Xia, Feng ;
Wang, Li-Zhong ;
Chang, Xiang-Yang ;
Zhang, Yin-Fa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 161 (03) :726-737
[2]   Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor [J].
Halpern, Stephen H. ;
Carvalho, Brendan .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (03) :921-928
[3]   Effect and Safety of Remifentanil Patient-Controlled Analgesia Compared with Epidural Analgesia in Labor: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Zhang, Peijun ;
Yu, Zhiqiang ;
Zhai, Meili ;
Cui, Jian ;
Wang, Jianbo .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2021, 86 (03) :231-238
[4]   Labor analgesia: Comparison of epidural patient-controlled analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia [J].
Sugur, Tayfun ;
Kizilates, Esra ;
Kizilates, Ali ;
Inanoglu, Kerem ;
Karsli, Bilge .
AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2020, 32 (01) :8-18
[5]   High Dosage of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with Low Background Infusion during Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Wei, Yu ;
Wang, Yilong ;
Zhao, Yanhong ;
Wu, Chaomin ;
Liu, Henry ;
Yang, Zeyong .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (04)
[6]   The influence of patient-controlled epidural analgesia on labor progress and neonatal outcome [J].
Rzepka, Rafal ;
Zukowski, Maciej ;
Michalczyk, Michal ;
Nikodemski, Tomasz ;
Torbe, Andrzej ;
Kwiatkowski, Sebastian ;
Mikolajek-Bedner, Wioletta ;
Czajka, Ryszard .
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2012, 83 (02) :92-98
[7]   Remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia on intrapartum maternal fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Lu, Guolin ;
Yao, Wenshui ;
Chen, Xiaofen ;
Zhang, Sujing ;
Zhou, Min .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
[8]   Evaluation of the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in epidural labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhou, Huanmian ;
Wen, Jing ;
Guo, Guangsheng ;
Zhao, Yifan ;
Liu, Weifeng .
MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2022, 88 (10) :842-852
[9]   Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor does not always improve maternal satisfaction [J].
Nikkola, E ;
Läärä, A ;
Hinkka, S ;
Ekblad, U ;
Kero, P ;
Salonen, M .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (02) :188-194
[10]   Dural puncture epidural versus conventional epidural analgesia for labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies [J].
Yin, Haiying ;
Tong, Xin ;
Huang, Han .
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (03) :413-427