The Effect of Adding a Background Infusion to Patient-Controlled Epidural Labor Analgesia on Labor, Maternal, and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:52
|
作者
Heesen, Michael [1 ]
Boehmer, Johannes [2 ]
Kloehr, Sven [2 ]
Hofmann, Thomas [2 ]
Rossaint, Rolf [3 ]
Straube, Sebastian [4 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital Baden, Dept Anaesthesia, Baden, Switzerland
[2] Klinikum Bruderwald, Dept Anesthesiol, D-96049 Bamberg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Aachen, Dept Anesthesiol, Aachen, Germany
[4] Univ Alberta, Div Prevent Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2015年 / 121卷 / 01期
关键词
ROPIVACAINE; PCEA; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; POTENCIES; TRIAL; BOLUS;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000000743
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has gained popularity, but it is still unclear whether adding a background infusion confers any benefit. METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and ISI WOS was performed to identify randomized controlled double-blind trials that compare PCEA-only with PCEA combined with a continuous infusion (PCEA + CI) in parturients. The data were subjected to meta-analyses using the random-effects model. Our primary outcome was the incidence of instrumental vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes were incidences of spontaneous vaginal and cesarean deliveries, duration of labor, analgesic outcomes, maternal outcomes (visual analog scale scores for pain, maternal satisfaction, nausea, pruritus, hypotension), and neonatal outcomes (Apgar score, umbilical artery pH). RESULTS: We identified 7 trials with a low risk of bias, reporting on 891 parturients, for inclusion in our systematic review. The risk of instrumental vaginal delivery was increased in the PCEA + CI group, risk ratio (RR) 1.66 (95% confidence interval 1.08-2.56, P = 0.02; I-2 = 0%); the RR for cesarean delivery was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.61-1.13, I-2 = 0%). The second stage of labor was prolonged (weighted mean difference 12.3 minutes, 95% confidence interval 5.1-19.5 minutes, P = 0.0008; I-2 = 0%) in the PCEA + CI group. Fewer patients in the PCEA + CI group required physician-administered boluses (RR 0.35 [95% confidence interval 0.25-0.47, P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%]). No differences regarding maternal adverse events (nausea, pruritus, hypotension) or neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores <7, umbilical artery pH) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of current evidence, no conclusion can be drawn regarding the risks or benefits of adding a continuous background infusion to PCEA compared with PCEA-only epidural labor analgesia. Further high-quality studies involving a sufficient number of patients are required.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 158
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Epidural labor analgesia: Continuous infusion versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia with background infusion versus without a background infusion
    Vallejo, Manuel C.
    Ramesh, Vimala
    Phelps, Amy L.
    Sah, Neera
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 8 (12): : 970 - 975
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lei, Xiuzhen
    Yu, Yang
    Li, Mei
    Fang, Peng
    Gan, Shuyuan
    Yao, Yongxing
    Zhou, Yanfeng
    Kang, Xianhui
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [3] Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Regimens for Labor Analgesia: Background Infusion or Demand-Only?
    Koopmans, Niels
    Wietasch, Gotz J. K.
    Struys, Michel M. R. F.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 109 (01): : 284 - 284
  • [4] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia vs. continuous infusion for labor pain. A meta-analysis
    Van der Vyver, MJ
    Halpern, SH
    Joseph, G
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (1A) : U27 - U27
  • [5] The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review
    Leighton, BL
    Halpern, SH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (05) : S69 - S77
  • [7] Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor
    Smiley, Richard M.
    Stephenson, Leroi
    INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 2007, 45 (01) : 83 - 98
  • [8] Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor
    Halpern, Stephen H.
    Carvalho, Brendan
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (03): : 921 - 928
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of epidural clonidine by continuous infusion or patient-controlled analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xia, Feng
    Wang, Li-Zhong
    Chang, Xiang-Yang
    Zhang, Yin-Fa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 161 (03) : 726 - 737
  • [10] Patient-controlled analgesia with background remifentanil infusion for labor pain
    Balki, M
    Kasodekar, S
    Dhumne, S
    Bernstein, P
    Carvalho, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 104 (04) : B13 - B13