Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Teachers: A Meta-Analysis of the Emerging Evidence Base

被引:108
作者
Klingbeil, David A. [1 ]
Renshaw, Tyler L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Educ Psychol, 1912 Speedway 254 B,D5800, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
mindfulness; meta-analysis; educators; teachers; schools; ROBUST VARIANCE-ESTIMATION; TEACHING MINDFULNESS; STRESS PREVENTION; META-REGRESSION; EFFECT SIZES; FEASIBILITY; EDUCATORS; EFFICACY; STUDENT; COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1037/spq0000291
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Teachers report high levels of occupational stress, which is associated with teacher turnover and potential negative consequences for students. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) may improve the protective factors that buffer educators against occupational stress. Although previous meta-analytic reviews synthesized the effects of MBIs for healthy and clinical samples of adults, this study was the first to synthesize the effects of MBIs for teachers (grades pre-K through 12). A total of 347 effect sizes from 29 studies (N = 1,493) were synthesized using metaregression with robust variance estimation. Overall, MBIs had a medium treatment effect on teacher outcomes (g = .601, SE = .089). Visual and statistical evidence of publication bias suggested this estimate may be positively biased. Three potential study-level moderators for overall effects were also examined, but none were statistically significant. MBIs were associated with small-to-medium positive effects on therapeutic processes and therapeutic outcomes. MBIs had the smallest effects on measures of classroom climate and instructional practices. Overall, findings were similar to other meta-analytic reviews of MBIs for nonclinical adult populations and working professionals. The literature on MBIs for teachers appears to have similar gaps as research on MBIs for adults (e.g., Davidson & Kaszniak, 2015), including the primary use of self-report measures, the lack of active treatment comparisons, and rare reporting of treatment fidelity data. Directions for future research and implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 511
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[61]   The Influence of Affective Teacher-Student Relationships on Students' School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach [J].
Roorda, Debora L. ;
Koomen, Helma M. Y. ;
Spilt, Jantine L. ;
Oort, Frans J. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 81 (04) :493-529
[62]  
Rupprecht S., 2017, EUROPEAN J ED RES, V6, P565, DOI DOI 10.12973/EU-JER.6.4.565
[63]  
Sanetti LMH, 2009, SCHOOL PSYCHOL REV, V38, P445
[64]  
Shapiro S., 2016, Handbook of mindfulness in education: Integrating theory and research into practice, P83, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3506-2_6, 10.1007/978-1-4939-3506-2_6, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3506-26]
[65]   Mechanisms of mindfulness [J].
Shapiro, SL ;
Carlson, LE ;
Astin, JA ;
Freedman, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 62 (03) :373-386
[66]  
Simon A., 2009, RES EFFECT INNER RES
[67]   Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS [J].
Tanner-Smith, Emily E. ;
Tipton, Elizabeth .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (01) :13-30
[68]   Examining Ways That a Mindfulness-Based Intervention Reduces Stress in Public School Teachers: a Mixed-Methods Study [J].
Taylor, Cynthia ;
Harrison, Jessica ;
Haimovitz, Kyla ;
Oberle, Eva ;
Thomson, Kimberly ;
Schonert-Reichl, Kimberly ;
Roeser, Robert W. .
MINDFULNESS, 2016, 7 (01) :115-129
[69]   Small Sample Adjustments for Robust Variance Estimation With Meta-Regression [J].
Tipton, Elizabeth .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2015, 20 (03) :375-393
[70]   Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package [J].
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2010, 36 (03) :1-48