Model selection for high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate

被引:12
作者
Mazaheri, Yousef [1 ,2 ]
Hotker, Andreas M. [2 ]
Shukla-Dave, Amita [1 ,2 ]
Akin, Oguz [2 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI); Prostate cancer (PCa); Mono-exponential model (ME); Bi-exponential model (BE); Diffusion kurtosis (DK); Stretched exponential (SE); DIFFERENT MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; WATER DIFFUSION; CANCER; AGGRESSIVENESS; REPEATABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2017.10.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the abilities of the standard mono-exponential (ME), bi-exponential (BE), diffusion kurtosis (DK) and stretched exponential (SE) models to characterize diffusion signal in malignant and prostatic tissues and determine which of the four models best characterizes these tissues on a per-voxel basis.& para;& para;Materials and methods: This institutional-review-board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study included 55 patients (median age, 61 years; range, 42-77 years) with untreated, biopsy-proven PCa who underwent endorectal coil MRI at 3-Tesla, diffusion-weighted MRI acquired at eight b-values from 0 to 2000 s/mm(2). Estimated parameters were apparent diffusion coefficent (ME model); diffusion coefficients for the fast (D-fast) and slow (D-slow) components and fraction of fast component, f(fast) (BE model); diffusion coefficient D, and kurtosis K (DK model); distributed diffusion coefficient DDC and a for (SE model). For one region-of-interest (ROI) in PZ and another in PCa in each patient, the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) and the Akaike weight (w) were calculated for each voxel.& para;& para;Results: Based on AICc and w, all non-monoexponential models outperformed the ME model in PZ and PCa. The DK model in PZ and SE model in PCa ROIs best fit the greatest average percentages of voxels (39% and 43%, respectively) and had the highest mean w (35 +/- 16 x 10(-2) and 41 +/- 22 x 10(-2), respectively).& para;& para;Conclusion: DK and SE models best fit DWI data in PZ and PCa, and non-ME models consistently outperformed the ME model. Voxel-wise mapping of the preferential model demonstrated that the vast majority of voxels in either tissue type were best fit with one of the non-monoexponential models. At the given SNR levels, the maximum b-value of 2000 s/mm(2) is not sufficiently high to identify the preferred non-monoexponential model.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 27
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model
    Bennett, KM
    Schmainda, KM
    Bennett, R
    Rowe, DB
    Lu, HB
    Hyde, JS
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (04) : 727 - 734
  • [2] 16 T Diffusion Microimaging of Fixed Prostate Tissue: Preliminary Findings
    Bourne, Roger
    Kurniawan, Nyoman
    Cowin, Gary
    Syed, Paul
    Watson, Geoff
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2011, 66 (01) : 244 - 247
  • [3] Information Theoretic Ranking of Four Models of Diffusion Attenuation in Fresh and Fixed Prostate Tissue Ex Vivo
    Bourne, Roger M.
    Panagiotaki, Eleftheria
    Bongers, Andre
    Sved, Paul
    Watson, Geoffrey
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2014, 72 (05) : 1418 - 1426
  • [4] A reflective Newton method for minimizing a quadratic function subject to bounds on some of the variables
    Coleman, TF
    Li, YY
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 6 (04) : 1040 - 1058
  • [5] Choosing the optimal fit function: Comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the F-test
    Glatting, Gerhard
    Kletting, Peter
    Reske, Sven N.
    Hohl, Kathrin
    Ring, Christina
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (11) : 4285 - 4292
  • [6] Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer
    Haider, Masoom A.
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Tanguay, Jeff
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Hashmi, Ali-Tahir
    Lockwood, Gina
    Trachtenberg, John
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (02) : 323 - 328
  • [7] Evaluation of Different Mathematical Models for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Normal Prostate and Prostate Cancer Using High b-Values: A Repeatability Study
    Jambor, Ivan
    Merisaari, Harri
    Taimen, Pekka
    Bostrom, Peter
    Minn, Heikki
    Pesola, Marko
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2015, 73 (05) : 1988 - 1998
  • [8] Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging
    Jensen, JH
    Helpern, JA
    Ramani, A
    Lu, HZ
    Kaczynski, K
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (06) : 1432 - 1440
  • [9] Value of diffusion-weighted Imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil - Preliminary results
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (12) : 842 - 847
  • [10] Comparison of Stretched-Exponential and Monoexponential Model Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissues
    Liu, Xiaohang
    Zhou, Liangping
    Peng, Weijun
    Wang, He
    Zhang, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (04) : 1078 - 1085