Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Identify Aggressive Prostate Cancer at the Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Level

被引:24
作者
Beksac, Alp Tuna [1 ]
Cumarasamy, Shivaram [1 ]
Falagario, Ugo [1 ]
Xu, Paige [1 ]
Takhar, Mandeep [4 ]
Alshalalfa, Mohamed [4 ]
Gupta, Akriti [1 ]
Prasad, Sonya [1 ]
Martini, Alberto [1 ]
Thulasidass, Hari [1 ]
Rai, Richa [1 ]
Berger, Mark [2 ]
Hectors, Stefanie [2 ]
Jordan, Jennifer [4 ]
Davicioni, Elai [4 ]
Nair, Sujit [1 ]
Haines, Kenneth, III [3 ]
Lewis, Sara [2 ]
Rastinehad, Ardeshir [1 ]
Yadav, Kamlesh [1 ]
Jayaratna, Isuru [1 ]
Taouli, Bachir [2 ]
Tewari, Ashutosh [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Urol, 1425 Madison Ave,6th Floor,Suite L6-70, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] GenomeDx Biosci Inc, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatectomy; genomics; diagnostic imaging; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; GLEASON GRADE; VERSION; BIOPSY; HETEROGENEITY; PATTERNS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is a diagnostic tool for prostate cancer with limited data on prognostic use. We sought to determine whether multiparametric magnetic resonance could predict aggressive prostate cancer features. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 206 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2013 and 2017. All patients had available RNA expression data on the final pathology specimen obtained from a location corresponding to a lesion location on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. The association between the PIRADS (TM) (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score and adverse pathology features were analyzed. We also performed differential transcriptomic analysis between the PIRADS groups. Factors associated with adverse pathology were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: Lesion size (p = 0.03), PIRADS score (p = 0.02) and extraprostatic extension (p = 0.01) associated significantly with the Decipher (R) score. Multivariable analysis showed that the PIRADS score (referent PIRADS 3, OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.2-57.5, p = 0.04), the Gleason Grade Group (referent 3, OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.5-21.1, p = 0.01) and prostate specific antigen (OR 1.103, 95% CI 1.011-1.203) were risk factors for adverse pathology findings. The difference between PIRADS 4 and 5 did not reach significance (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.8-4.5, p = 0.12). However, the PI3K-AKT-mTOR, WNT-beta and E2F signaling pathways were more active in PIRADS 5 than in PIRADS 4 cases. Conclusions: The PIRADS score is associated with adverse pathology results, increased metastatic risk and differential genomic pathway activation.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1249
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Nuclear mTOR acts as a transcriptional integrator of the androgen signaling pathway in prostate cancer
    Audet-Walsh, Etienne
    Dufour, Catherine R.
    Yee, Tracey
    Zouanat, Fatima Z.
    Yan, Ming
    Kalloghlian, Georges
    Vernier, Mathieu
    Caron, Maxime
    Bourque, Guillaume
    Scarlata, Eleonora
    Hamel, Lucie
    Brimo, Fadi
    Aprikian, Armen G.
    Lapointe, Jacques
    Chevalier, Simone
    Giguere, Vincent
    [J]. GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 31 (12) : 1228 - 1242
  • [2] Genomic Predictors of Outcome in Prostate Cancer
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Bjartell, Anders S.
    Catto, James W. F.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Lilja, Hans
    Loeb, Stacy
    Schalken, Jack
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (06) : 1033 - 1044
  • [3] Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer
    Boutros, Paul C.
    Fraser, Michael
    Harding, Nicholas J.
    de Borja, Richard
    Trudel, Dominique
    Lalonde, Emilie
    Meng, Alice
    Hennings-Yeomans, Pablo H.
    McPherson, Andrew
    Sabelnykova, Veronica Y.
    Zia, Amin
    Fox, Natalie S.
    Livingstone, Julie
    Shiah, Yu-Jia
    Wang, Jianxin
    Beck, Timothy A.
    Have, Cherry L.
    Chong, Taryne
    Sam, Michelle
    Johns, Jeremy
    Timms, Lee
    Buchner, Nicholas
    Wong, Ada
    Watson, John D.
    Simmons, Trent T.
    P'ng, Christine
    Zafarana, Gaetano
    Nguyen, Francis
    Luo, Xuemei
    Chu, Kenneth C.
    Prokopec, Stephenie D.
    Sykes, Jenna
    Dal Pra, Alan
    Berlin, Alejandro
    Brown, Andrew
    Chan-Seng-Yue, Michelle A.
    Yousif, Fouad
    Denroche, Robert E.
    Chong, Lauren C.
    Chen, Gregory M.
    Jung, Esther
    Fung, Clement
    Starmans, Maud H. W.
    Chen, Hanbo
    Govind, Shaylan K.
    Hawley, James
    D'Costa, Alister
    Pintilie, Melania
    Waggott, Daryl
    Hach, Faraz
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2015, 47 (07) : 736 - +
  • [4] Cavalieri E, 2000, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P75
  • [5] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Blank, K
    Broderick, GA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Wein, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 969 - 974
  • [6] Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2342 prospective patients
    Den, R. B.
    Santiago-Jimenez, M.
    Alter, J.
    Schliekelman, M.
    Wagner, J. R.
    Renzulli, J. F., II
    Lee, D. I.
    Brito, C. G.
    Monahan, K.
    Gburek, B.
    Kella, N.
    Vallabhan, G.
    Abdollah, F.
    Trabulsi, E. J.
    Lallas, C. D.
    Gomella, L. G.
    Woodlief, T. L.
    Haddad, Z.
    Lam, L. L. C.
    Deheshi, S.
    Wang, Q.
    Choeurng, V.
    du Plessis, M.
    Jordan, J.
    Parks, B.
    Shin, H.
    Buerki, C.
    Yousefi, K.
    Davicioni, E.
    Patel, V. R.
    Shah, N. L.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2016, 19 (04) : 374 - 379
  • [7] Druskin SC, 2017, RES REP UROL, V9, P55, DOI 10.2147/RRU.S128499
  • [8] The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Egevad, Lars
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [9] Discovery and Validation of a Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier that Predicts Early Metastasis Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Erho, Nicholas
    Crisan, Anamaria
    Vergara, Ismael A.
    Mitra, Anirban P.
    Ghadessi, Mercedeh
    Buerki, Christine
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Kollmeyer, Thomas
    Fink, Stephanie
    Haddad, Zaid
    Zimmermann, Benedikt
    Sierocinski, Thomas
    Ballman, Karla V.
    Triche, Timothy J.
    Black, Peter C.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Klee, George
    Davicioni, Elai
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06):
  • [10] Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Somford, Diederik M.
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Scheenen, Thomas
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) : 453 - 461