Nasogastric nutrition is efficacious in severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:46
|
作者
Nally, Deirdre M. [1 ]
Kelly, Enda G. [2 ]
Clarke, Mary [3 ,4 ]
Ridgway, Paul [5 ]
机构
[1] Limerick Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dept Psychiat, Dublin 2, Ireland
[4] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dept Psychol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[5] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Adelaide & Meath Hosp AMNCH, Dublin 24, Ireland
关键词
Nasogastric feeding; Enteral nutrition; Severe acute pancreatitis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EARLY ENTERAL NUTRITION; PARENTERAL-NUTRITION; ILL PATIENTS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; TUBE; CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1017/S0007114514002566
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
In patients with severe acute pancreatitis (AP), enteral nutrition is delivered by nasojejunal (NJ) tube to minimise pancreatic stimulation. Nasogastric (NG) feeding represents an alternative route. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of NG feeding. Secondary objectives were to compare the NG and NJ routes and assess the side effects of the former. The primary endpoint was exclusive NG feeding with delivery of 75% of nutritional targets. Additional outcomes included change to total parenteral nutrition (TPN), increased pain or disease severity, vomiting, diarrhoea, delivery rate reduction and tube displacement. Among the retrieved studies, six were found to be eligible for the qualitative review and four for the meta-analysis. NG nutrition was received by 147 patients; exclusive NG feeding was achieved in 90% (133/147). Of the 147 patients, 129 (87 %) received 75% of the target energy. In studies where all subjects received exclusive NG nutrition, 82% (seventy-four of the ninety patients) received >75% of the intended energy. Compared with NJ nutrition, there was no significant difference in the delivery of 75% of nutritional targets (pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.02; 95% CI 0.75, 1.38.) or no increased risk of change to TPN (pooled RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.45, 2.48), diarrhoea (pooled RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.62, 2.66), exacerbation of pain (pooled RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.47, 2.61) or tube displacement (pooled RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.11, 1.73). Vomiting and diarrhoea were the most common side effects of NG feeding (13.3 and 12.9 %, respectively). With respect to the delivery of nutrition, 11.2% of the patients required delivery rate reduction and 3.4% dislodged the tube. Other side effects included elevated levels of aspirates (9.1 %), abdominal distension (1.5 %), pain exacerbation (7.5 %) and increased disease severity (1.6 %). In conclusion, NG feeding is efficacious in 90% of patients. Further research is required to optimise the delivery of NG nutrition and examine 'gut-rousing' approaches to nutrition in patients with severe AP.
引用
收藏
页码:1769 / 1778
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nasogastric nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nally, D.
    Kelly, E.
    Byrne, M.
    Ridgway, P. F.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 183 : S53 - S53
  • [3] Early nasogastric enteral nutrition for severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review
    Kun Jiang
    Xin-Zu Chen
    Qing Xia
    Wen-Fu Tang
    Lei Wang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 13 (39) : 5253 - 5260
  • [4] Comparison of nasogastric feeding versus nasojejunal feeding for severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Ying-Jie
    Jing, Xue
    Tian, Zi-Bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (11): : 22814 - 22823
  • [5] Enteral nutrition is superior to total parenteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jafri, Nadim S.
    Mahid, Suhal S.
    Gopathi, Swapna K.
    Homung, Carlton A.
    Galandiuk, Susan
    McClave, Stephen A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A141 - A141
  • [6] Nasogastric Nutrition versus Nasojejunal Nutrition in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhu, Youfeng
    Yin, Haiyan
    Zhang, Rui
    Ye, Xiaoling
    Wei, Jianrui
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [7] Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition formulations in acute pancreatitis
    Petrov, M. S.
    Loveday, B. P. T.
    Pylypchuk, R. D.
    McIlroy, K.
    Phillips, A. R. J.
    Windsor, J. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (11) : 1243 - 1252
  • [8] Nasogastric or nasojejunal feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis
    Chang, Yu-sui
    Fu, Hua-qun
    Xiao, Yuan-mei
    Liu, Ji-chun
    CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (03):
  • [9] Nasogastric or nasojejunal feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis
    Yu-sui Chang
    Hua-qun Fu
    Yuan-mei Xiao
    Ji-chun Liu
    Critical Care, 17
  • [10] Peritoneal Lavage for Severe Acute Pancreatitis A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Li, Zhiqiang
    Xia, Chunhui
    Zhang, Li
    Zhang, Yingang
    Liu, Zizhuo
    Qiu, Fang
    PANCREAS, 2016, 45 (06) : 806 - 813