Does ambiguity aversion survive in experimental asset markets?

被引:22
作者
Füllbrunn, Sascha [1 ]
Rau, Holger A. [2 ]
Weitzel, Utz [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, IMR, Dept Econ, NL-6525 GD Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Lehrstuhl Volkswirtschaftslehre, D-90403 Nurnberg, Germany
关键词
Financial market; Experiment; Ambiguity; Uncertainty; COMPARATIVE IGNORANCE; UNCERTAINTY AVERSION; INFORMATION; CHOICE; MATTER; MODEL; RISK; PREFERENCES; DISPERSION; BUBBLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although a number of theoretical studies explain empirical puzzles in finance with ambiguity aversion, it is not a given that individual ambiguity attitudes survive in markets. In fact, despite ample evidence of ambiguity aversion in individual decision making, most studies find no or only limited ambiguity aversion in experimental financial markets, even when they exclude arbitrage. We argue that ambiguity effects in markets depend on market feedback and on a sufficiently strong bias toward ambiguity among the participants. Accordingly, we find significant ambiguity effects in low-feedback call markets for assets that provoke high ambiguity aversion, but no ambiguity effects in high-feedback double auctions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 826
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[71]  
Stahl Dale O., 2013, REV EC STAT
[72]  
STARMER C, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P971
[73]  
Trautmann S.T., 2013, BLACKWELL HDB JUDGME
[74]   Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences [J].
Trautmann, Stefan T. ;
Vieider, Ferdinand M. ;
Wakker, Peter P. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2008, 36 (03) :225-243
[75]   Model misspecification and underdiversification [J].
Uppal, R ;
Wang, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (06) :2465-2486