Large-eddy simulation of shock-wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction with and without SparkJet control

被引:19
作者
Guang, Yang [1 ]
Yao Yufeng [2 ]
Jian, Fang [1 ,3 ]
Tian, Gan [1 ]
Li Qiushi [1 ]
Lu Lipeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Natl Key Lab Sci & Technol Aeroengine Aerothermod, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Univ W England, Fac Environm & Technol, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[3] STFC, Daresbury Lab, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Warrington WA4 4AD, Cheshire, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Large-eddy simulation; Shock-wave; Turbulent boundary layer; Interaction; SparkJet control; HIGH-SPEED FLOW; LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; VORTEX GENERATORS; JET ACTUATOR; WAVE; TURBULENCE; AERODYNAMICS; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cja.2016.04.001
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The efficiency and mechanism of an active control device "SparkJet" and its application in shock-induced separation control are studied using large-eddy simulation in this paper. The base flow is the interaction of an oblique shock-wave generated by 8 degrees wedge and a spatially-developing Ma = 2.3 turbulent boundary layer. The Reynolds number based on the incoming flow property and the boundary layer displacement thickness at the impinging point without shock-wave is 20000. The detailed numerical approaches were presented. The inflow turbulence was generated using the digital filter method to avoid artificial temporal or streamwise periodicity. The numerical results including velocity profile, Reynolds stress profile, skin friction, and wall pressure were systematically validated against the available wind tunnel particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements of the same flow condition. Further study on the control of flow separation due to the strong shock-viscous interaction using an active control actuator "SparkJet" was conducted. The single-pulsed characteristic of the device was obtained and compared with the experiment. Both instantaneous and time-averaged flow fields have shown that the jet flow issuing from the actuator cavity enhances the flow mixing inside the boundary layer, making the boundary layer more resistant to flow separation. Skin friction coefficient distribution shows that the separation bubble length is reduced by about 35% with control exerted. (C) 2016 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 629
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SHOCK-WAVES AND BOUNDARY-LAYERS [J].
ADAMSON, TC ;
MESSITER, AF .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1980, 12 :103-138
[2]  
Adelgren RG, 2001, AIAA20010885
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, THESIS
[4]  
Babinsky H., 2011, Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer (interactions, V32
[5]   SBLI control for wings and inlets [J].
Babinsky, Holger ;
Ogawa, Hideaki .
SHOCK WAVES, 2008, 18 (02) :89-96
[6]   Plasma synthetic jet actuator: electrical and optical analysis of the discharge [J].
Belinger, A. ;
Naude, N. ;
Cambronne, J. P. ;
Caruana, D. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2014, 47 (34)
[7]   Effects of micro-ramps on a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction [J].
Blinde, Paul L. ;
Humble, Ray A. ;
van Oudheusden, Bas W. ;
Scarano, Fulvio .
SHOCK WAVES, 2009, 19 (06) :507-520
[8]   A stable and conservative interface treatment of arbitrary spatial accuracy [J].
Carpenter, MH ;
Nordström, J ;
Gottlieb, D .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1999, 148 (02) :341-365
[9]  
Caruana Daniel, 2013, International Journal of Aerodynamics, V3, P71, DOI 10.1504/IJAD.2013.050925
[10]  
Caruana D., 2009, AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2009-1307