Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer:: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial

被引:759
作者
Bartelink, Harry
Horiot, Jean-Claude
Poortmans, Philip M.
Struikmans, Henk
Van den Bogaert, Walter
Fourquet, Alain
Jager, Jos J.
Hoogenraad, Willem J.
Oei, S. Bing
Warlam-Rodenhuis, Carla C.
Pierart, Marianne
Collette, Laurence
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] St Radboud Hosp, Joint Ctr Radiotherpy Amherm Nijmegen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radiotherapeutisch Inst Limburg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[4] Dr Bernard Verbeeten Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] European Org Res Treatment Canc, Brussels, Belgium
[8] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiat Oncol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[9] Inst Curie, Dept Radiat Oncol, Paris, France
[10] Ctr Georges Francois Leclerc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dijon, France
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.4991
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the long-term impact of a boost radiation dose of 16 Gy on local control, fibrosis, and overall survival for patients with stage I and II breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving therapy. Patients and Methods A total of 5,318 patients with microscopically complete excision followed by whole-breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomly assigned to receive either a boost dose of 16 Gy ( 2,661 patients) or no boost dose ( 2,657 patients), with a median follow-up of 10.8 years. Results The median age was 55 years. Local recurrence was reported as the first treatment failure in 278 patients with no boost versus 165 patients with boost; at 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the no boost and the boost group, respectively ( P < .0001). The hazard ratio of local recurrence was 0.59 ( 0.46 to 0.76) in favor of the boost, with no statistically significant interaction per age group. The absolute risk reduction at 10 years per age group was the largest in patients <= 40 years of age: 23.9% to 13.5% ( P = .0014). As a result, the number of salvage mastectomies has been reduced by 41%. Severe fibrosis was statistically significantly increased ( P < .0001) in the boost group, with a 10-year rate of 4.4% versus 1.6% in the no boost group ( P < .0001). Survival at 10 years was 82% in both arms. Conclusion A fter a median follow-up period of 10.8 years, a boost dose of 16 Gy led to improved local control in all age groups, but no difference in survival.
引用
收藏
页码:3259 / 3265
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]  
ALBAIN KS, 1994, MONOGR NATL CANC I, V16, P35
[3]   Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. [J].
Bartelink, H ;
Horiot, J ;
Poortmans, P ;
Struikmans, H ;
Van den Bogaert, W ;
Barillot, I ;
Fourquet, A ;
Borger, J ;
Jager, J ;
Hoogenraad, W ;
Collette, L ;
Pierart, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (19) :1378-1387
[4]   QUALITY ASSURANCE IN CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF EARLY BREAST-CANCER - REPORT ON A CONSENSUS MEETING OF THE EORTC RADIOTHERAPY AND BREAST-CANCER COOPERATIVE GROUPS AND THE EUSOMA (EUROPEAN-SOCIETY-OF-MASTOLOGY) [J].
BARTELINK, H ;
GARAVAGLIA, G ;
JOHANSSON, KA ;
MIJNHEER, BJ ;
VANDENBOGAERT, W ;
VANTIENHOVEN, G ;
YARNOLD, J .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1991, 22 (04) :323-326
[5]  
Blichert-Toft M, 1992, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P19
[6]   RISK-FACTORS IN BREAST-CONSERVATION THERAPY [J].
BORGER, J ;
KEMPERMAN, H ;
HART, A ;
PETERSE, H ;
VANDONGEN, J ;
BARTELINK, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (04) :653-660
[7]   Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: Results of EORTC trial 10801 [J].
Curran, D ;
van Dongen, JP ;
Aaronson, NK ;
Kiebert, G ;
Fentiman, IS ;
Mignolet, F ;
Bartelink, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (03) :307-314
[8]   AGE AS PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST-CARCINOMA [J].
DELAROCHEFORDIERE, A ;
ASSELAIN, B ;
CAMPANA, F ;
SCHOLL, SM ;
FENTON, J ;
VILCOQ, JR ;
DURAND, JC ;
POUILLART, P ;
MAGDELENAT, H ;
FOURQUET, A .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8852) :1039-1043
[9]   High local recurrence risk after breast-conserving therapy in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients is greatly reduced by one course of perioperative chemotherapy: A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group study [J].
Elkhuizen, PHM ;
van Slooten, HJ ;
Clahsen, PC ;
Hermans, J ;
van de Velde, CJH ;
van den Broek, LCJM ;
van de Vijver, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (05) :1075-1083
[10]  
FISHER B, 1992, SEMIN SURG ONCOL, V8, P153