Current status and future trends of offshore wind power in Europe

被引：153

作者：

Soares-Ramos, Emanuel P. P. ^{[1
,2
]}

de Oliveira-Assis, Lais ^{[2
]}

Sarrias-Mena, Raul ^{[3
]}

Fernandez-Ramirez, Luis M. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Fed Ctr Technol Educ Minas Gerais, Dept Electroelect, R Raymundo Mattoso 900, BR-35790000 Curvelo, MG, Brazil

[2] Univ Cadiz, Dept Elect Engn, Sustainable & Renewable Elect Technol, EPS Algeciras, Avda Ramon Puyol S-N, Cadiz 11202, Spain

[3] Univ Cadiz, Dept Engn Automat Elect & Comp Architecture & Net, Sustainable & Renewable Elect Technol, EPS Algeciras, Avda Ramon Puyol S-N, Cadiz 11202, Spain

来源：

ENERGY | 2020年 / 202卷

关键词：

Offshore wind farms; Large-scale; Trends; Europe; Current status; TRANSMISSION; FOUNDATIONS; TURBINES; COST;

D O I：

10.1016/j.energy.2020.117787

中图分类号：

O414.1 [热力学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

A considerable growth of large-scale offshore wind farms (OWF) is noticeable in Europe mainly due to advances in wind turbines and foundation structures, which have improved their economic conditions and contributed to the implementation of offshore plants. It is expected that the installed capacity will continue to increase, since the European Union aims at reaching about 100 GW of offshore wind capacity by 2030. OWF have many challenges in terms of cost reduction and technology. Due to these issues, it is important to have a comprehensive understanding of the current situation and the future trends of OWF. This paper analyses the current status and the trends of large-scale OWF with an installed capacity above 150 MW in Europe. The results show the trends on wind turbine size and capacity, turbine model, distance to shore, water depth, investment cost, type of foundation, transmission technology, and voltage array systems among others. This paper gathers the latest information about the topic, deducing future trends from the evaluation of OWF fully commissioned, authorized or under construction. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页数：18

共 101 条

[61] Hybrid AC-DC Offshore Wind Power Plant Topology: Optimal Design [J].

de Prada, Mikel ;

Igualada, Lucia ;

Corchero, Cristina ;

Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol ;

Sumper, Andreas .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (04) :1868-1876

[62] Europe, China and the United States: Three different approaches to the development of offshore wind energy [J].

Decastro, M. ;

Salvador, S. ;

Gomez-Gesteira, M. ;

Costoya, X. ;

Carvalho, D. ;

Sanz-Larruga, F. J. ;

Gimeno, L. .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 109 :55-70

[63] Guidelines for assessment of investment cost for offshore wind generation [J].

Dicorato, M. ;

Forte, G. ;

Pisani, M. ;

Trovato, M. .

RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (08) :2043-2051

[64] Why offshore wind energy? [J].

Dolores Esteban, M. ;

Javier Diez, J. ;

Lopez, Jose S. ;

Negro, Vicente .

RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (02) :444-450

[65]

Eerens H., 2008, ETC/ACC Technical Paper

[66] Review of offshore wind farm cost components [J].

Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Angel G. .

ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 37 :10-19

[67] The economics of offshore wind [J].

Green, Richard ;

Vasilakos, Nicholas .

ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (02) :496-502

[68]

Hammar L., 2010, ADAPTING OFFSHORE WI

[69] The cost of offshore wind: Understanding the past and projecting the future [J].

Heptonstall, Philip ;

Gross, Robert ;

Greenacre, Philip ;

Cockerill, Tim .

ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 41 :815-821

[70] Comparing offshore and onshore wind development considering acceptance costs [J].

Hevia-Koch, Pablo ;

Jacobsen, Henrik Klinge .

ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 125 :9-19

← 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 →