共 2 条
How to approach nuclear modernization? A US response
被引:2
作者:
Kroenig, Matthew
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Govt, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Atlantic Council, Brent Scowcroft Ctr Int Secur, Washington, DC USA
关键词:
China;
Cold War;
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty;
no-first-use policy;
North Korea;
nuclear weapon modernization;
nuclear weapons;
Russia;
Ukraine;
United States;
D O I:
10.1177/0096340215581356
中图分类号:
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号:
030207 ;
摘要:
Between 2014 and 2023, the United States expects to spend $355 billion to modernize its nuclear arsenal. In subsequent decades, even higher expenditures are envisioned. But Washington is far from alone in modernizing its nuclear weapons. According to researchers from the Federation of American Scientists, all the nuclear-armed states have ambitious nuclear weapon modernization programs ... that appear intended to prolong the nuclear era indefinitely. Disarmament advocates believe such modernizations are fundamentally at odds with the goal of eliminating nuclear weaponswhile weapon states argue that, as long as nuclear weapons exist, arsenals must be modernized in order to keep them safe, secure, and effective. Here, Eugene Miasnikov of Russia (2015), Matthew Kroenig of the United States, and Lu Yin of China (2015) debate howin a world where complete disarmament is nearly every nation's stated goal but disarmament seems by no means imminentnuclear-armed countries should approach the maintenance and modernization of their arsenals.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 18
页数:3
相关论文